Your message dated Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:30:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line evolution-data-server: Please rebuild with libnss3-dev and
libnspr4-dev (and evolution, too)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: evolution-data-server
Severity: wishlist
Heya,
It looks like your package still depends on a mozilla library in
testing. As upstream declared mozilla to be dead and moved all
functionality that is needed to embed gecko and friends to a new
software suite (xulrunner), you should update your package to work with
those. At the moment, it looks like we don't want to release etch with
mozilla [1].
This means that your package needs to update it's
build-dependencies to the new packages provided by xulrunner. The
interface shouldn't have changed, so looking at this mapping, changing
the packaging a bit and doing a test-build should be enough:
libnspr-dev -> libnspr4-dev
libnspr4 -> libnspr4-0d
libnss-dev -> libnss3-dev
libnss3 -> libnss3-0d
mozilla-dev -> libxul-dev (probably, you may need to change include pathes)
As far as I can, you've done the switch for the version in experimental
- it would be nice if you could either do the same for unstable if you
do another release or don't lose the patch you've used for that and
close this bug when you upload the new branch to unstable.
Marc
Footnotes:
[1] Mozilla security maintenance isn't easy anyway, but releasing it
and with that promising security support *after* it was declared
dead by upstream would be insane. So we don't want to do that.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 03:42:07PM +0200, Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> why did you reopen #354578 with an old version reference (1.4.2.1-2)
> that is obsoleted for a long time in unstable (now 1.6.3-1)?
>
> Can we close it again?
Oh sorry, I had still some old evolution-data-server installed without
realizing I had newer ones as well.
Closing
Sorry for the noise
Mike
--- End Message ---
