On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 10:43:21AM -0100, Graham Inggs wrote: > I tried a few reproducible builds [1] and it fails more often than > not. It seems to be slightly more reliable on arm64. I've copied the > output of the failing test below. > > It looks like the same test failure described in #1053546 [2], and a > patch is available there.
Thank you, I'm going to try the patch. It would be strange because the current failure is not specific to single-cpu systems, and previously I was able to build the package fine on all sorts of systems (including single-cpu). Thanks.
