Hi, On 2025-12-13 08:55, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 5:58 AM Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > While I fully agree that we should eventually get rid of libusb 0.1, > > bumping bugs from wishlist to serious without any explanation is a bit > > agressive. > > Sorry, I guess they should have been filed at a higher severity or > bumped at some point. But these bugs were also filed a decade ago. > libusb-1.0 1.0 has been in Unstable since 2008. The old libusb 0.1 > series has been unmaintained upstream for a very long time. Early in > the forky development cycle seems a good time to raise the severity. > Packages have more than a year before the expected freezes begin for > Debian 14. > > > Does it mean that you are planning to coordinate the removal? On my side > > I currently have limited time for that. > > I'm trying to get the old libusb out of Testing. It's much more > difficult to complete the removal from Unstable.
Do you plan to fill bugs for the packages still using libusb 0.1, but without corresponding bug? For instance lirc switch to libusb-1.0 (#810445), but later re-enabled it in version 0.10.2-0.3... Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://aurel32.net
