Source: slrnface
Version: 2.1.1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: Grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], Rhonda D'Vine <[email protected]>;, 
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]>, Package Salvaging Team 
<[email protected]>

Dear Rhonda,

I suggest removing slrnface from Debian for the following reasons:

 * It accumulated one RC-bug:
   + #1115212 slrnface: FTBFS with glibc 2.42 due to removal of obsolete termio 
interface
 * It seems dead upstream so we need to fix it in Debian
 * There are very few votes in popcon
   
https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=slrnface&show_installed=on&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
 * There seems to be no active maintainer

This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be
reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package.

In case the package should be kept in unstable, please evaluate the
RC-bugs listed above.
 * If the bug no longer applies, please close it. If it is closed, check
   whether the fixed version is correct and adjust if necessary.

 * Is the bug really release-critical? If not, please downgrade.

 * If the bug still applies, please send a status update at least once a year.

Once the mentioned RC bugs has been acted upon in one way or another,
please close this bug.

In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this
bug report:

    Control: severity -1 normal
    Control: retitle -1 RM: slrnface -- RoM; rc-buggy, dead upstream
    Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
    Control: affects -1 + src:slrnface

Alternatively, you may wait a month and have it reassigned.

In case you disagree with the above, please add a wontfix tag to this bug.

    Control: tags -1 + wontfix

Doing so will also prevent reassignment.

This package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[1] initiative, which
aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through
the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating
packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to help newcomers become familiar
with a consistent Git-based workflow.


Kind regards
    Andreas.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/qa/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 
'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.12.38+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=de_DE:de
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Reply via email to