On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > It builds only one binary, so the Architecture line is incorrect. > > No it builds on ia64 and amd64 as well. > > | Specifying a list of architectures indicates that the source will > | build an architecture-dependent package, and will only work > | correctly on the listed architectures.[31] > > | 31 > | This is a setting used for a minority of cases where the program is not > | portable. Generally, it should not be used for new packages. > > > But you are right that I could > > have had listed just the architectures that are officially supported. > > However > > it is much easier for me to let upstream handle that than to do it myself > > as well. It is detected very early in the build process so it do not take > > that much resources on the build servers and I do not update the package > > that often. > > The package will end up in either P-a-s or in not-for-us rather fast and > will be not longer built without manual intervention.
I see. I was not aware that such mechanism was there. > > I have filed the bug to ftp.debian.org now in any case. When it has > > been corrected I'll lower the severity. > > Fix the Architecture line and close it. It does not hit the case where > this is not possible. Ok. Regards, // Ola > Bastian > > -- > Knowledge, sir, should be free to all! > -- Harry Mudd, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3 > > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
