Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 00:13:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390277: gaim-extendedprefs: uninstallable with gaim2.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gaim-extendedprefs
Version: 0.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
since the upload of gaim2.0 this package is uninstallable in Sid.
Andreas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500,
'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.11
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages gaim-extendedprefs depends on:
ii gaim 1:1.5.0+1.5.1cvs20051015-6 multi-protocol instant messaging c
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
gaim-extendedprefs recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 01.10.06 23:42:27, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> Op za, 30-09-2006 te 09:38 +0200, schreef Andreas Pakulat:
> > Package: gaim-extendedprefs
> > Version: 0.5-3
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > since the upload of gaim2.0 this package is uninstallable in Sid.
>
> Thanks for your bug report. A new version of gaim-extendedprefs (0.5-4)
> has been uploaded already and is available for i386 and sparc already.
It's amd64 and sparc actually ;)
> I saw you tagged this bug sid, but I presume I can close this bug or
> should I wait until gaim-extendedprefs is build on all architectures?
Closing it with this answer, seems like the rebuild just takes a bit
more time than normal (Upload was apparently on Sept, 28th).
Should've looked at packages.qa.debian.org first, sorry for the noise
Andreas
--
Give your very best today. Heaven knows it's little enough.
--- End Message ---
