Your message dated Wed, 5 Nov 2025 12:44:17 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1111398: cambalache: cambalache build-depends on 
missing: - python-gi-dev:amd64 (>= 3.52)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1111398,
regarding cambalache: cambalache build-depends on missing: - 
python-gi-dev:amd64 (>= 3.52)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1111398: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1111398
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cambalache
Version: 0.97.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

Dear maintainer,

cambalache is BD-Uninstallable:

Dependency installability problem for cambalache on amd64:

cambalache build-depends on missing:
- python-gi-dev:amd64 (>= 3.52)

Dependency installability problem for cambalache on arm64:

cambalache build-depends on missing:
- python-gi-dev:arm64 (>= 3.52)

etc

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cambalache

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 04 Nov 2025 at 14:02:29 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 at 18:12:40 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
cambalache build-depends on missing:
- python-gi-dev:amd64 (>= 3.52)

This seems to have been uploaded to unstable prematurely. The issue should be resolved automatically when we start the pygobject 3.54 transition (#1118613)

This transition has now started, so cambalache should be buildable in unstable shortly. (The missing runtime dependency on python3-lxml, #1111456, still seems to be a valid RC bug in cambalache though.)

    smcv

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to