John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I only presently use darcs out of all the VCS supported by *-load-dirs. > All the others are maintained based on patches that people send in. I > have always been clear that if some VCS I don't use stops working, I > will remove it to prevent all the others from suffering the same fate. > This happened with baz-load-dirs.
Where is this clarification ? I don't see any README.Debian explaining this special way of maintaining a package. > It is completely wrong to file a grave bug against a different package > just because some other package you liked was removed. > > I really feel that this is wishlist, but I'll set it to important for > now. It would have been wishlist if this package was not is Debian already, but here you are removing a feature which is not obsolete. It is grave because i've got baz-load-dirs installed at home and it is now broken because of the load-dirs-common upgrade, rendering it unworkable. If this was a real stop of baz support, then load-dirs-common should have conflicted with baz-load-dirs to ensure no broken package remains. Of course i'd rather baz-load-dirs to be reintroduced. Is there any other problem now that bazaar is back in testing ? -- Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgp1fXEnfQjMq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
