Hey everyone.
On Fri, 2025-10-24 at 17:01 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
>
> AsciiDoc is only required to generate the man-pages. However, since
> the
> upstream tar-ball already includes these, there is no need to
> generate
> them when building the Debian package, which is why there is no
> build-dep on asciidoc-base.
I think that's the culprit I've missed.
> In the excerpt you have included above,
> however, make has decided to attempt to regenerate the man-pages, and
> it
> has failed. Can you provide more context?
I was applying some patches[0] to see whether they're properly
rendered,... guess the build system noticed that their sources were
newer than the already build manpages.
Without any changes, it builds without asciidoctor, as you say.
>From my side we can close this.
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Chris.
PS: @Jeremy,... I've submitted another series[1] upstream which deals
with improving their nftables.service.in ... and there will be a
2nd one with ideas for making more use of systemd's sandboxing
options.
I would want to see the same changes in Debian's nftables.service,
but I thought I wait with upstream opinions before I file a PR in
salsa.
But you might have already look at the first series and tell me
what you think about them.
[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/[email protected]/T/#t
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/[email protected]/T/#t
