Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2025 10:49:19 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1118519: fixed in opentsne 1.0.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1118519,
regarding opentsne: autopkgtest regression on some architectures with scikit 
1.7.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1118519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: opentsne
Version: 1.0.2-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected]
User: [email protected]
Usertags: arm64
User: [email protected]
Usertags: riscv64
User: [email protected]
Usertags: s390x
User: [email protected]
Usertags: scikit-learn-1.7

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dear maintainer,

your package has an autopkgtest regression with sckit-learn 1.7.2. I'm 
quoting the arm64 [1] error below, but it is the same failing test on 
risc64 [2] and s390x [3] as well:

[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/opentsne/testing/arm64/65339152/
[2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/opentsne/testing/riscv64/65333862/
[3] https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/opentsne/testing/s390x/65330911/


220s =================================== FAILURES 
===================================
220s _________ TestTSNECorrectnessUsingPrecomputedDistanceMatrix.test_iris 
__________
220s
220s self = 
<tests.test_correctness.TestTSNECorrectnessUsingPrecomputedDistanceMatrix 
testMethod=test_iris>
220s
220s     @unittest.skipIf(('i686' in machine) or machine == 'i386'
220s                        or machine == 'ppc64le',
220s                      reason=f"Skipping test on {machine} architecture")
220s     def test_iris(self):
220s         x = datasets.load_iris().data
220s         print(platform.machine())
220s         x += np.random.normal(0, 1e-3, x.shape)  # iris contains duplicate 
rows
220s
220s         distances = squareform(pdist(x))
220s         params = dict(initialization="random", random_state=0)
220s         embedding1 = TSNE(metric="precomputed", **params).fit(distances)
220s         embedding2 = TSNE(metric="euclidean", **params).fit(x)
220s
220s >       np.testing.assert_almost_equal(embedding1, embedding2)
220s E       AssertionError:
220s E       Arrays are not almost equal to 7 decimals
220s E
220s E       Mismatched elements: 300 / 300 (100%)
220s E       Max absolute difference among violations: 4.85427071
220s E       Max relative difference among violations: 47.91193852
220s E        ACTUAL: TSNEEmbedding([[ 11.855024 ,  15.4978719],
220s E                      [ 11.7985732,  12.7515209],
220s E                      [ 12.8316039,  13.2288263],...
220s E        DESIRED: TSNEEmbedding([[ 13.8717067,  11.1420085],
220s E                      [ 14.6164783,   8.511387 ],
220s E                      [ 15.4360712,   9.2738073],...
220s
220s tests/test_correctness.py:307: AssertionError


Cheers
Timo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=tUDO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: opentsne
Source-Version: 1.0.2-5
Done: Drew Parsons <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
opentsne, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Drew Parsons <[email protected]> (supplier of updated opentsne package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:49:39 +0200
Source: opentsne
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian PaN Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Drew Parsons <[email protected]>
Closes: 1118519
Changes:
 opentsne (1.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * debian patch computed_distances_PR274.patch applies initial draft
     of upstream PR#741 to fix tests of computed distances.
     Closes: #1118519.
Checksums-Sha1:
 38ee8711331ddbb8b9e7cc7397928d3f9a5f3542 2323 opentsne_1.0.2-5.dsc
 aaf5391c1bcdc23e88a64ecac8f55b779e24162c 6128 opentsne_1.0.2-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 b51a7f61a5a71fb91266d95c68fc29685ba108f7965398dbdb1f46e0b6fb1cca 2323 
opentsne_1.0.2-5.dsc
 9afbaa8035bbb471103fb6a2b59a45819e9f4a14e58dd3eaf8bf2f4a4537b01e 6128 
opentsne_1.0.2-5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 1a5a05343d1f220fd85a60aa137f160f 2323 python optional opentsne_1.0.2-5.dsc
 4b80c8698aeb5f254c0a715e95eed6b9 6128 python optional 
opentsne_1.0.2-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=a3d1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpjJd17olIdY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to