On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 02:19:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Adrian,
Hi Andreas, >... > I wonder whether it might be more effort for you to simply push your > patches to Debian Med Git (any DD has push permissions). yes, this would be more effort for me. Right now I might be fixing RC bugs in ~ 100 packages per week, my interest is to have a process that is fast for me and does not depend on having to look at who the maintainer is. It is fine for me when a maintainer then picks the changes from my NMU and does a maintainer upload instead, and the maintainer process might use the Salsa CI - but that's not something I want to worry about. Only debian/ or complete sources? debian/patches/ or patches applied? One git repository per package, or 1k packages in one git repository? CI enabled or not? And the contents of a git tag does sometimes not match the contents of the package in the archive. I want to stay out of this mess when fixing bugs. > Salsa CI would > have told you about this problem. Alternatively uploading via Debusine > would have run the autopkgtest as well. I do check updates_excuses, which gives me the results of the Britney CI after the upload. Doing a second NMU in exceptional cases where it is necessary is far less work for me than monitoring the results of two CIs. > In any case I'd like to repeat that your effort is really welcome > Andreas. >... cu Adrian
