On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:36:08PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Much to my bafflement, I notice that 0.29 built successfully on sparc, > but 0.30 FTBFS. Also, the machine that built 0.29 may not be the same > as the one that built 0.30; for sparc, these were phleebhut and auric, > respectively.
"phleebhut" is not a Debian buildd. It's possible that 0.29 succeeded only because someone hand-built the package without a timeout and uploaded it. > I suspect that there may be a hardware problem on some of the buildd > machines. No, it looks to me like monotone is running a command during the build that takes an unreasonably long time to complete on a number of our architectures. We could ask the buildd maintainers to increase timeouts for monotone, but given that the timeout is happening when executing a runtime command that's *part* of the package, I do have to wonder whether the resulting binaries are actually useful if they're this slow. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
