-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, only a short question: Is there some good reason why we should not integrate the proposed patch (by Albert Cahalan on debburn-devel [1] or [2]) which would fix the license problems? Because if not I would appreciate a check-in to the svn repository. And we can close this Bug (#387783 ([3])).
The only other solution would be to step back to a version without such restrictions. But I hope that won't be the solution. Greetings, Kai [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/000064.html [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debburn-devel/2006-September/000066.html [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=387783 - -- Kai Wasserbäch (Kai Wasserbaech) E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber (debianforum.de): Drizzt URL: http://wiki.debianforum.de/Drizzt_Do%27Urden GnuPG-Key: 0xB0F385B4 (http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB0F385B4&fingerprint=on&hash=on&op=vindex) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQGVAwUBRRVFlQjhutiw84W0AQqJaAv8DSVbnh3iqZTyjOQ5Ri2K061lIjWPKtZd 8PB4MuSqtVcAZDWY7GeRQkkF34MfRfedL1GBMG9gkPZ6n5MqXtnCuYbp7eVWijw/ qJRNgT7vYGsgoTpfX+FbT2gmbs29h0J9ZighfJC0Nntj3BmVoJmLQhTWoB+69Eju v4iKWekUjyLU68y66dNCg2EGmsiHmIOvc5LzXoFph81kgkbmk0hmGptBd/wzRuK6 6kMd6t2XQzVa8BTo4q92jGLXa3q0RTaeMNDrGpKMBK/vzDcCTP3Co97fxF/vHARd gMhzg1Aj32Fw1cqTen1FiBeXEHQA8brNqu1dwW0sN1L/PKt96SDvMqE3/86jVRd0 7bwkLaQOXXiVmzaw5sjFSW84exRha+Oam5Ca32G9YMLnma/s/VJ3Xo9PC6fIZ4sJ aorOKTmcrKB6rrPj0ytgcc/08/SIxRuqHvF1WcalWMlRvhlKaI2Se5zu2O71yp38 oJ5w4b2z0DgJt+AS+/pLlOY/37nBdIrC =J+h4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
