On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 06:07:01PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > severity 1102062 serious > thanks > > Hi. This package FTBFS around 50% of the time here. > > It may not fail for everybody, but we promised our users that > they can rebuild the packages from source. A failure rate > of 50% exceeds the common thresholds used by the RT. > > [ I can still offer a test VM to reproduce if required, but if I > was the maintainer, I would just disable the flaky test ]. > > ( Note: The stable version also FTBFS randomly )
Hi Santiago, Thank you for performing these test builds. I'm not able to coerce the test or the build to fail on 3 different systems in 10 overall attempts. This makes me suspect something related to the build environment, possibly either the networking stack or CPU. The logs you provide show a fairly simple test that creates a ZK client timing out (taking over 60 seconds) because it never registers with JMX. Are sockets scarce in your build environment? Cores? [ERROR] Tests run: 2, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 122.365 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.zookeeper.test.SaslAuthRequiredMultiClientTest The tests are getting stuck here during some of your builds: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/zookeeper/-/blob/master/zookeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/zookeeper/test/JMXEnv.java#L100-129 The test completes quickly in all of my trials: [INFO] Running org.apache.zookeeper.test.SaslAuthRequiredMultiClientTest [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.205 s - in org.apache.zookeeper.test.SaslAuthRequiredMultiClientTest Please do provide either a VM or more information about the build environment where this fails and I will work to get the bottom of it. As far as I can see, there's nothing flaky about the test code. If there are specific system requirements for a successful build, we will document those. And if we can get patch the test to build successfully in the environment where it fails, we will do that too. However, I don't see the utility in increasing the severity of the bug to RC and thereby excluding this package and its multiple reverse dependencies from trixie. I think the bug severity should be important. Thanks, tony
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
