Hi Ahmad,

On Tue, 27 May 2025 17:44:38 +0100, Ahmad Khalifa <ah...@khalifa.ws> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2025 12:37:41 +0200 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 serious  
> 
> Seeing as this severity got bumped and wine is scheduled for auto 
> removal, do you need any help with updating this?
> 
> Looking at what d/rules does, this seems straightforward to remove from 
> the build process as VERSION is always blank due to version from 
> DEB_SOURCE when it's name only.
> 
> Just a "no-VERSION" d/control would work and DEBSUFFIX would always be 
> "-stable" now there is now wine-development. The dh files can all be 
> renamed and replaced as well from what I can see.

The goal is still to have debian/* work as-is for both wine and
wine-development. The fix is to make debian/control depend on
debian/control.in and debian/changelog (since the latter determines
DEB_SOURCE), make the clean targets depend on debian/control, and stop
deleting debian/control from debian/clean. That way, any change to content
influencing debian/control results in a rebuild of debian/control, but
regular rebuilds don’t.

> I would offer an MR on salsa, but v10~repack-3 doesn't seem to be there. 
> Do you need a hand with this fix?

Thanks for the offer! I’m preparing a regular upload to fix this,
unfortunately without the VCS.

Regards,

Stephen

Attachment: pgpNv4P392raY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to