On 26/05/25 at 12:07 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > El 26/5/25 a las 11:08, Lucas Nussbaum escribió: > > ijs was fixed by Sergio (Cced) with the following patch: > > > > diff -Nru ijs-0.35/debian/rules ijs-0.35/debian/rules > > --- ijs-0.35/debian/rules 2025-02-19 17:59:38.000000000 +0100 > > +++ ijs-0.35/debian/rules 2025-05-25 00:47:55.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ > > > > # put aside upstream-shipped temp files during build but after > > copyright-check > > upstreamtmpfiles = ltmain.sh configure aclocal.m4 Makefile.in ijs_spec.pdf > > -pre-build:: debian/stamp-upstreamtmpstuff > > +pre-build:: debian/force-autoreconf debian/stamp-upstreamtmpstuff > > +debian/force-autoreconf: > > + autoreconf -fi > > debian/stamp-upstreamtmpstuff: debian/stamp-copyright-check > > for file in $(upstreamtmpfiles); do \ > > [ ! -e $$file ] || [ -e $$file.upstream ] || cp -a $$file > > $$file.upstream; \ > > Ok, the natural question here would be: > > Why do we have to do that now but not in the past?
I debbisected it: bisection finished successfully last good timestamp: 20250423T023047Z first bad timestamp: 20250423T091925Z only one package differs: cdbs 0.4.171 -> 0.4.172 Looking at cdbs' changes history between those two releases, this sounds relevant: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/cdbs/-/commit/5efba11b142b73ffbfa61fff09cdacc3d6db52b9 but I don't understand the change itself. @Alexandre ? > Can we fix that in cdbs once (if that's really the root of the problem) > instead of fixing several different packages? > > (Adding Alexandre to CC as he did the last cdbs uploads) Lucas
