On Fri, Apr 25, 2025, at 5:19 PM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > I missed that the LLVM change was *only* done for 19 (and if the rustc > with the raised/reverted baseline would have behaved unexpectedly, I might > have realized sooner!).
and this 19 here should of course been an 18 (hopefully clear from context, but better make it explicit rather than causing more confusion!).
