Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On 4/17/25 10:23 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed that it 
regularly fails on arm64, while other architectures seem fine. Unfortunately, 
the test doesn't produce any output, so I can't give any advice on the failure 
based on that. I noticed that this test downloads some data from the internet, 
maybe adding a timeout to wget and some debugging info might help identify 
problems related to that. Maybe having a retry in case of network issues might 
be prudent. The arm64 ci.d.n hosts are located in China (as are the loong64 and 
riscv64 hosts, which don't seem to suffer (or less)).

wget already retries 20 times by default I don't see how that can be improved.

If the network fails, the autopkgtest cannot be run.

Runner with unreliable network should not satisfy the needs-internet 
requirement.

Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on
regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between
passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages,
are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these
tests.

Gotta love how autopkgtest are just another hindrance to testing migration.

Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.

I've made the wget and tar commands verbose, but that doesn't solve the problem.

Removing the autopkgtest or excluding unreliable architectures will be needed 
instead. I don't really want to do either, but nuking the autopkgtest from the 
package resolves this class of issues forever.

Kind Regards,

Bas

--
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Reply via email to