On 16 April 2025 at 22:13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| On 16/04/25 at 14:51 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > 
| > On 16 April 2025 at 21:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| > | Source: rjava
| > | Version: 1.0-11-1
| > | Severity: serious
| > | Justification: FTBFS
| > | Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
| > | User: lu...@debian.org
| > | Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
| > | 
| > | Hi,
| > | 
| > | During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
| > | to build on armel.
| > 
| > Can you tru 1.0-11-2, please?  It has
| > 
| >     rjava (1.0-11-2) unstable; urgency=medium
| > 
| >       * debian/control: Add libzstd-dev to Build-Depends    (Closes: 
#1103203)
| >       * debian/control: Set Build-Depends: to current R version
| >       * debian/control: Set Standards-Version: to current version
| > 
| >      -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>  Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:59:33 -0500
| 
| Same error with 1.0-11-2 in unstable. Build log attached.
| 
| It also fails on the buildd: 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rjava&arch=armel&ver=1.0-11-2&stamp=1744803351&raw=0

Yikes.  That is weird. rJava is an old and stable package, R itself was just
released and I don't think there were any changes for these odder
architectures (ie armel, mipsel64).

We already skip java-for-R on a few platforms. R itself has

  default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-any !hurd-any] | \
  openjdk-10-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-any !hurd-any]

and I may have to expand that.

Dirk
 
| Lucas
| x[DELETED ATTACHMENT rjava.log, plain text]

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org

Reply via email to