On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 5:46 AM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 4/8/25 10:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Thomas, I think a 2-day NMU fixing only this bug is appropriate, but > > since you got review feedback from Sandro, try to go through it in order > > to improve the change. > > I'm happy to comply to any suggestion. So far, I haven't read any that > deserve a change, only one remark about the ordering of ADP0 before AC > and AC0, though IMO that's not changing anything to the final result > (ie: have all 3 (AC, AC0 and ADP0) supported). Though if that is the > only blocker, I'll happily do as suggested.
in my reply, i asked you 3 questions: let me cut and paste them here below so you may have a chance to answer them: 1. have you contacted upstream about this patch? 2. do you have any references in the kernel code for this new path? 3. or a reason why sometimes you added ADP0 as the first item in the list, and others as the last one?
