Your message dated Tue, 08 Apr 2025 07:24:52 +0000
with message-id <e1u23kg-004d9t...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1101871: fixed in pocl 6.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101871,
regarding src:pocl: fails to migrate to testing for too long
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1101871: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pocl
Version: 6.0-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 6.0-5
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:pocl has been trying to migrate for 31 days [2], hence this bug report. The current output of the migration software for this package is copied to the bottom of this report and should list the reason why the package is blocked.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

This bug submission immediately closes the bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing. This bug is also tagged to only affect sid and trixie, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the process, please reach out to me.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg00001.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pocl

Current text from [2]:
Migration status for pocl (6.0-4 to 6.0-5): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for pocl/6.0-5: amd64: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), arm64: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻) ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for pyopencl/2024.1-3: amd64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), arm64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻)
∙ ∙ Not built on buildd: arch amd64 binaries uploaded by deb...@abeckmann.de
∙ ∙ missing build on armel
∙ ∙ missing build on armhf
∙ ∙ missing build on i386
∙ ∙ arch:armel not built yet, autopkgtest delayed there
∙ ∙ arch:armhf not built yet, autopkgtest delayed there
∙ ∙ arch:i386 not built yet, autopkgtest delayed there
Additional info:
∙ ∙ Updating pocl will fix bugs in testing: #1097326
∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/p/pocl.html
∙ ∙ Reproducible on amd64 - info ♻ ∙ ∙ Reproducible on arm64 - info ♻ ∙ ∙ Waiting for reproducibility test results on armhf - info ♻ ∙ ∙ 31 days old (needed 5 days)

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pocl
Source-Version: 6.0-6
Done: Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pocl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1101...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> (supplier of updated pocl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 07:32:27 +0200
Source: pocl
Architecture: source
Version: 6.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenCL Maintainers <pkg-opencl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org>
Closes: 1101871
Changes:
 pocl (6.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add runtime dependency on llvm-spirv.
   * Expect the spirv tests to fail on 32-bit architectures. (Closes: #1101871)
Checksums-Sha1:
 a99d4208a9f9df8f70b5dbc8ccaf392321f365ea 2774 pocl_6.0-6.dsc
 6bf8e5355902b995d1c6cdf24fc70f2a97785aac 23720 pocl_6.0-6.debian.tar.xz
 5e95dfceaef87fcb07f42f01f1f5bad1becec0b7 8180 pocl_6.0-6_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c0b89dac006210d5ff7c3a99d4a76a9d4c668db0671e369682459b398a64dcc3 2774 
pocl_6.0-6.dsc
 ea1bb0f0799fecf06c9eab5b13da13d2a0bf5a0cf9a22e8ea008276a7b048d48 23720 
pocl_6.0-6.debian.tar.xz
 8a9b6b4fb17d115b95c14410fb08ddb0d58c7ebbf2945bcc2ddecb12db81f8a1 8180 
pocl_6.0-6_source.buildinfo
Files:
 57caaf7f99a28316403a86ad53e0df9d 2774 libs optional pocl_6.0-6.dsc
 1e59e5adf862c218c79ab5782976287c 23720 libs optional pocl_6.0-6.debian.tar.xz
 78f88f11cabb401a9d3ca13a6aac4016 8180 libs optional pocl_6.0-6_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=W/fa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgp8MQBMgyGoN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to