Hi h01ger, On 29-01-2025 19:19, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 10:38:54AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:I did that for both the armel and armhf architectures (see the arm32-defaults.diff patch), but this is unchecked for any other release architectures, and obviously wrong for some architectures.Please could you run (at least on amd64) /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --help and look for the last lines like Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order: x86-64-v4 (supported, searched) x86-64-v3 (supported, searched) x86-64-v2 (supported, searched) on the machines where you saw that?shall I (still) run this on all our amd64 build nodes (which are 4) and just attach the results to this bug report?
I assume it is still valid to do this. At least without information this bug might remain RC and I understand is hardly actionable. I guess you only need to inspect the two nodes that were used for one of the failing llvm-toolchain-18|19 runs e.g. ionos1-amd64 vs ionos15-amd64
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
