Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2025 08:25:32 +0200
with message-id <174340233207.1558412.15357076972016749...@cairon.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1101632: precious: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:37:
binary] Error 25
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101632,
regarding precious: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:37: binary] Error 25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1101632: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: precious
Version: 0.8.0+~0.2.1+20220602+~0.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250327 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh binary
> dh_update_autotools_config
> dh_autoreconf
> dh_auto_configure --buildsystem=rust
> /usr/share/dh-rust/bin/cargo prepare-debian debian/cargo_registry
> debian cargo wrapper: options, profiles, parallel, lto: ['parallel=8'] []
> ['-j8'] 0
> debian cargo wrapper: rust_type, gnu_type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
> x86_64-linux-gnu
> debian cargo wrapper: linking /usr/share/cargo/registry/* into
> /build/reproducible-path/precious-0.8.0+~0.2.1+20220602+~0.0.2/debian/cargo_registry/
> cargo update
> error: failed to select a version for the requirement `thiserror = "^2.0.11"`
> candidate versions found which didn't match: 1.0.69
> location searched: directory source
> `/build/reproducible-path/precious-0.8.0+~0.2.1+20220602+~0.0.2/debian/cargo_registry`
> (which is replacing registry `crates-io`)
> required by package `precious-helpers v0.8.0
> (/build/reproducible-path/precious-0.8.0+~0.2.1+20220602+~0.0.2/precious-helpers)`
> perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored?
> dh_auto_configure: error: cargo update returned exit code 101
> make: *** [debian/rules:37: binary] Error 25
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2025/03/27/precious_0.8.0+~0.2.1+20220602+~0.0.2-1_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20250327;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20250327&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8.0+~0.2.1+20220602+~0.0.2-1
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2025-03-29 21:19:11)
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
This is fixed by now. Thanks for reporting!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
* Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
--- End Message ---
