Your message dated Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:51:30 -0500 with message-id <Z8chgvNWeG7QZAkY@colossus> and subject line Re: Bug#1095129: chewmail: Should chewmail be removed from unstable? has caused the Debian Bug report #1095129, regarding chewmail: Should chewmail be removed from unstable? to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1095129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095129 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: chewmail Version: 1.3-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: grab attention of maintainer X-Debbugs-Cc: 512...@bugs.debian.org, Eric Dorland <e...@debian.org>, Enrico Zini <enr...@debian.org> Dear maintainer, I suggest removing chewmail from Debian for the following reasons: * It accumulated one RC-bug: + #512231 If all mail is archived, it deletes the source mailbox before being done writing the archive files * It is not a key package. * Last maintainer upload 2014. * Upstream seems to be inactive - at least no response to forwarding the issue reported in bug #512231 * popcon inst: 28 vote: 6 This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package. In case the package should be kept in unstable, please evaluate each of the RC-bugs listed above. * If the bug no longer applies, please close it. If it is closed, check whether the fixed version is correct and adjust if necessary. * If the bug still applies, please send a status update at least once a year. Once all of the mentioned RC bugs have been acted upon in one way or another, please close this bug. In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this bug report: Control: severity -1 normal Control: retitle -1 RM: chewmail -- RoM; rc-buggy Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:chewmail Alternatively, you may wait a month and have it reassigned. In case you disagree with the above, please downgrade this bug below RC severity. Doing so will also prevent automatic reassignment. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://github.com/zedinosaur/chewmail/issues/1 -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.3.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1.4-1 Actually close :) * Andreas Tille (ti...@debian.org) wrote: > Source: chewmail > Version: 1.3-1.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: grab attention of maintainer > X-Debbugs-Cc: 512...@bugs.debian.org, Eric Dorland <e...@debian.org>, Enrico > Zini <enr...@debian.org> > > Dear maintainer, > > I suggest removing chewmail from Debian for the following reasons: > * It accumulated one RC-bug: > + #512231 > If all mail is archived, it deletes the source mailbox before being > done writing the archive files > > * It is not a key package. > > * Last maintainer upload 2014. > > * Upstream seems to be inactive - at least no response to forwarding > the issue reported in bug #512231 > > * popcon inst: 28 vote: 6 > > This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be > reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package. > > In case the package should be kept in unstable, please evaluate each of the > RC-bugs listed above. > * If the bug no longer applies, please close it. If it is closed, check > whether the fixed version is correct and adjust if necessary. > > * If the bug still applies, please send a status update at least once a year. > > Once all of the mentioned RC bugs have been acted upon in one way or another, > please close this bug. > > In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this > bug report: > > Control: severity -1 normal > Control: retitle -1 RM: chewmail -- RoM; rc-buggy > Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:chewmail > > Alternatively, you may wait a month and have it reassigned. > > In case you disagree with the above, please downgrade this bug below RC > severity. Doing so will also prevent automatic reassignment. > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > [1] https://github.com/zedinosaur/chewmail/issues/1 > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: trixie/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), > (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 6.3.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN > Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not > set > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled -- Eric Dorland <e...@kuroneko.ca> 43CF 1228 F726 FD5B 474C E962 C256 FBD5 0022 1E93
--- End Message ---
