Removal sounds good. I haven't run it in about that long either, it's for a game that is not played much at all anymore, and it reaches inside libreadline in ways that shouldn't work, but did that long ago. I doubt it still would against a modern one (internals changing).
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 10:03 AM Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> wrote: > Source: empire-lafe > Version: 1.1-1.2 > Severity: serious > Justification: grab attention of maintainer > X-Debbugs-Cc: 1096...@bugs.debian.org, Drake Diedrich <d...@debian.org>, > Package Salvaging Team <team+salv...@tracker.debian.org> > > Dear maintainer, > > I suggest removing empire-lafe from Debian for the following reasons: > > * It received a FTBFS bug when using the upcoming gcc version 15 > * It was last uploaded by you 15 years ago > * Its a leaf package > * There are only very few votes in popcon > > https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=empire-lafe&show_installed=on&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1 > > This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be > reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package. > > In case the package should be kept in unstable, please evaluate bug > #1096581 and fix it most favourably before it becomes RC since gcc-15 > will become default. Once you have uploaded a fixed package please > close this bug. > > In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this > bug report: > > Control: severity -1 normal > Control: retitle -1 RM: empire-lafe -- RoM; rc-buggy > Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:empire-lafe > > Alternatively, you may wait a month and have it reassigned. > > In case you disagree with the above, please add a wontfix tag to this bug. > > Control: tags -1 + wontfix > > Doing so will also prevent automatic reassignment. > > Your package was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[1] initiative, which > aims to introduce newcomers to manageable tasks and guide them through > the workflow to solve them. The focus of this initiative is on migrating > packages to Salsa, as it's a great way to familiarize newcomers with a > consistent Git-based workflow. > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/tille/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: trixie/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), > (5, 'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 6.12.6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) > Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=de_DE:de > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled >
