Your message dated Wed, 15 Jan 2025 05:56:50 +0000 with message-id <e1txwoy-0078wr...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#1092832: fixed in ruby-hdfeos5 1.2-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092832, regarding ruby-hdfeos5: FTBFS with ruby3.3 (test failures) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1092832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092832 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: ruby-hdfeos5 Version: 1.2-13 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so X-Debbugs-Cc: Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org> Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS with ruby3.3 during the ruby3.3-add transition: ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Run tests for ruby3.3 from debian/ruby-test-files.yaml │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ RUBYLIB=/build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/debian/ruby-hdfeos5/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/vendor_ruby/3.3.0:/build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/debian/ruby-hdfeos5/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby:. GEM_PATH=/build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home/.local/share/gem/ruby/3.3.0:/var/lib/gems/3.3.0:/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0:/usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/gems/3.3.0:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/3.3.0:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/rubygems-integration/3.3.0 ruby3.3 -ryaml -e YAML.load_file\(\"debian/ruby-test-files.yaml\"\).each\ \{\ \|f\|\ require\ f\ \} /build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/debian/ruby-hdfeos5/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/vendor_ruby/3.3.0/numru/hdfeos5.rb:29: warning: undefining the allocator of T_DATA class NumRu::HE5 /build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/debian/ruby-hdfeos5/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/vendor_ruby/3.3.0/numru/hdfeos5.rb:70: warning: undefining the allocator of T_DATA class NumRu::HE5Gd /build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/debian/ruby-hdfeos5/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/vendor_ruby/3.3.0/numru/hdfeos5.rb:868: warning: undefining the allocator of T_DATA class NumRu::HE5GdField /build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/test/test_gd.rb:86: warning: undefining the allocator of T_DATA class NArray /build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/debian/ruby-hdfeos5/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/vendor_ruby/3.3.0/numru/hdfeos5.rb:19:in `open': undefined method `exists?' for class File (NoMethodError) if( File.exists?(filename)) ^^^^^^^^ Did you mean? exist? from /build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/test/test_gd.rb:96:in `<top (required)>' from <internal:/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:86:in `require' from <internal:/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:86:in `require' from -e:1:in `block in <main>' from -e:1:in `each' from -e:1:in `<main>' ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed. Exiting. dh_auto_install: error: dh_ruby --install /build/reproducible-path/ruby-hdfeos5-1.2/debian/ruby-hdfeos5 returned exit code 1 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby-hdfeos5&arch=amd64&ver=1.2-13%2Bb1&stamp=1736641618&raw=0 Youhei, can you investigate? Kind regards, Bas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: ruby-hdfeos5 Source-Version: 1.2-14 Done: Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ruby-hdfeos5, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1092...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org> (supplier of updated ruby-hdfeos5 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 14:10:43 +0900 Source: ruby-hdfeos5 Architecture: source Version: 1.2-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Youhei SASAKI <uwab...@gfd-dennou.org> Closes: 1092832 Changes: ruby-hdfeos5 (1.2-14) unstable; urgency=medium . * Add patch: Use exist? insteaf of exists?, which is obsolete(Closes: #1092832) Checksums-Sha1: 67194c5ae1103daabf101e713d27e42e3cf2aaf3 2178 ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14.dsc cdf7a38e0e836233b9779b150035c8d3d753cd5c 29144 ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14.debian.tar.xz 90a799906997eae7b86a52109878b07504bf7d72 11396 ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 719bd6cdcfed0d588414942e63099cf95f1fda763a6670276e73b53f4cebb5f4 2178 ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14.dsc 6ddae3c4df405801e0721519099d98c770aae7a4af873a6f07172d6c666a86ed 29144 ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14.debian.tar.xz 13eba652807a4014198064329746adb7093f7dd4b54acec4de88e7942d37f053 11396 ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14_amd64.buildinfo Files: a3fbb6ecb00b6f779905e21c45051a64 2178 ruby optional ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14.dsc 05224a0ded8a8287f98dc43abb474060 29144 ruby optional ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14.debian.tar.xz b5349bcec38551ceeee74c41b5937851 11396 ruby optional ruby-hdfeos5_1.2-14_amd64.buildinfo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEZqTqcE/iQFWNasLmk5TzVIkdfgcFAmeHSJgACgkQk5TzVIkd fgd7HA//ZC0y6ouNSAQiaGJDQAguNnByqNrEDRDLm0OhG3wAmRJYU+F3DAelb1BH vUWM6e5NjYcJX3X8HHD6+mK02XdxK6Nac5tj3PuulQFJ139HS3SqbtJXHEbyOPtl SDwcpsMt+kYivPNp3rO9/A1Lrpq9lWS2iSe8yLLfARIhsb36bajMX5g/PSD1v8nn ex3AWdbVCi79GOT6nTvkp1oxocPxL3h6q2TzM69DWSkD/U/WNGuIHofI9QOxO2Zv fv6d4n9zx2IcgvMvU+bCgQwAmkN/acf6yKpoDSENL3NG+Jsw08cFt9M+xft9hQXD CcXZfzgjarG3w8iw+yzC+k5gho3OErB4mwYscifOS4zV3UuxDTW22R8voFFOCcX9 IyI4L6Q+9KK0YqFuQWKXgbSKamecJzOnxWpgg5LMVIy1KLGiDaS31fMXNEA0pLIg 5fHgBDnlCOp8iFPZw3H4MWDvQ8GbbE9tP85EikqWviAQGNuhqqIW37o0uULyA0E6 AQ8WEs2+UmIuUqKH5a9xOvLa5DDOGOe1cgg/YJvmh5wtsqljsc1nWeQvKM/9EaQv imNrj3h+SKUJ71BV7Dj5W2oKh+GX7REAjbQPzfar/m3nCJDIQgDx+SC5oTUoXcMO XJxDuGs2XHIle/NkXYLof47fx1xn6Vjm+YP0epiU3+Y0amVVBlA= =fZ7b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpJWhuP4Qh0B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
