Quoting Blair Noctis (2024-12-25 15:35:21) > On 25/12/2024 22:04, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Blair Noctis (2024-12-25 08:45:12) > >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:15:26 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> wrote: > >>> Quoting Peter Green (2024-12-18 01:38:19) > (...) > >>>> After doing some exploration of the new API there doesn't seem to > >>>> be a way to try to parse a FatHeader without knowing before hand > >>>> if it is the 32 or 64 bit version. So I made the code try both > >>>> one after the other (and if both fail, it assumes it's not a > >>>> fat binary). > >>>> > >>>> After applying the patch, I got the same number of test failures > >>>> as reported in bug 1090040 > >>> > >>> Thanks for the bugreport, and the (later) patch. > >>> > >>> I am with weak network access the next week, and this seems of lesser > >>> priority due to sccache already broken for other reasons. > >>> > >>> If you prefer faster processing, then either nudge me some more or do a > >>> zero-day NMU, which is fine by me given the narrow changes isolated to > >>> the provided patch. > >> > >> Jonas, if you don't mind me doing what an Uploader does, I'll help > >> apply the patch, along with fixing the "other reasons" (i.e. #1090040 > >> FTBFS due to a test assuming presence of CARGO_HOME). > > > > I do mind you acting as uploader without us having worked as a team and > > established what that implies for us to fixing "other reasons" - i.e. > > how we as a team commonly handle issues. > > I took your permission of NMU to Peter and deduced I could do the same as an > Uploader. My apologies that didn't occur natural to you. > > > Please post to 1090...@bugs.debian.org how you would propose to solve > > that bugreport. > > Posted as you asked. > > > And also, please do tell if you would like to team up - I am quite open > > to that. I just don't approve of team-like actions without the teamwork. > I thought being added to Uploaders was some kind of acknowledgement that I'm > a member of the "team" maintaining this package. I apologize for asserting > too much. If you don't think that way, please remove me from that field. > > The note above was based on that thought, that I'm already in such a "team". > To me this *is* teamwork: I do some work, tell team members about it, and act > accordingly if they say something.
Arrrgh, I am very sorry: I had totally forgotten that we'd partnered up with this package. Yes yes yes, please do consider yourself an equal and work on the package as your own. I have pushed a change a moment ago, unrelated to this but just beware. It'd be great if you would fix this, and feel free to either coordinate with me or simply release if you confident about the changes you've made - I have no intention of acting as superior, I want us to be equals - I simply made a brain fart, please do accept my apology. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
