Control: tags -1 patch
On 20/11/2024 14:32, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:05:38 +0100 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the explanation.
On 01-11-2024 22:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> In this particular case, src:hdf5 [1] no longer provides the binary package
> libhdf5-openmpi-dev for any 32-bit architecture since version 1.10.10+repack-4
> which means the package is out-of-date for these architectures.
And as Peter already noted libhdf5-mpi-dev doesn't provide the required pieces.
@Gilles, can you help to figure out what src:vtk9 should do now since you had
to drop libhdf5-openmpi-dev. Instead of libhdf5-mpi-dev, should
libhdf5-mpich-dev be tried?
It seems to me that vtk9 should build-dep on libhdf5-mpi-dev instead of
libhdf5-openmpi-dev, in order to build against libhdf5-mpich-dev on those
architectures that don't support openmpi.
The attached debdiff built for me on i386.
Cheers,
Emilio
diff -Nru vtk9-9.3.0+dfsg1/debian/changelog vtk9-9.3.0+dfsg1/debian/changelog
--- vtk9-9.3.0+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2024-06-06 21:34:35.000000000 +0200
+++ vtk9-9.3.0+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2024-11-20 14:34:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+vtk9 (9.3.0+dfsg1-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Build against libhdf5-mpi-dev, since libhdf5-openmpi-dev is no longer
+ available on 32-bit architectures. Closes: #1078743.
+
+ -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:34:33 +0100
+
vtk9 (9.3.0+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru vtk9-9.3.0+dfsg1/debian/control vtk9-9.3.0+dfsg1/debian/control
--- vtk9-9.3.0+dfsg1/debian/control 2024-06-06 06:37:43.000000000 +0200
+++ vtk9-9.3.0+dfsg1/debian/control 2024-11-20 14:34:30.000000000 +0100
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
libgl2ps-dev,
libglew-dev,
libglu-dev,
- libhdf5-openmpi-dev,
+ libhdf5-mpi-dev,
libhpdf-dev,
libjpeg-dev,
libjs-mathjax,
