Your message dated Fri, 08 Nov 2024 18:01:51 +0000
with message-id <e1t9tit-0054h4...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1081401: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #976078,
regarding FTBFS: multiple definitions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
976078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libretro-mupen64plus
Version: 2.0+git20160207+dfsg2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
libretro-mupen64plus currently FTBFS in sid:
g++ -o mupen64plus_libretro.so [...]
/usr/bin/ld:
./mupen64plus-core/src/dd/dd_disk.o:./mupen64plus-core/src/dd/dd_disk.c:48:
multiple definition of `CUR_BLOCK';
./mupen64plus-core/src/dd/dd_controller.o:./mupen64plus-core/src/dd/dd_controller.c:39:
first defined here
That's probably related to gcc-10's now default no-common.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates-debug'), (500,
'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500,
'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'),
(1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages libretro-mupen64plus depends on:
ii libc6 2.31-4
ii libgcc-s1 [libgcc1] 10.2.0-16
ii libgl1 1.3.2-1
ii libgl1-mesa-glx 20.2.2-1
ii libstdc++6 10.2.0-16
pn retroarch | libretro-frontend <none>
libretro-mupen64plus recommends no packages.
libretro-mupen64plus suggests no packages.
--
Samuel
"...[Linux's] capacity to talk via any medium except smoke signals."
(By Dr. Greg Wettstein, Roger Maris Cancer Center)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0+git20160207+dfsg2-1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package libretro-mupen64plus has just been removed from the Debian
archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1081401
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.
Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
