Your message dated Sun, 03 Nov 2024 16:50:36 +0000 with message-id <e1t7doc-00f5ag...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#1078392: fixed in rpds-py 0.20.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1078392, regarding rpds-py: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1078392: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078392 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: rpds-py Version: 0.12.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' > rm -f Cargo.lock > make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' > dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=pybuild > I: pybuild plugin_pyproject:129: Building wheel for python3.12 with "build" > module > I: pybuild base:311: python3.12 -m build --skip-dependency-check > --no-isolation --wheel --outdir > /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.12_rpds-py > * Building wheel... > Running `maturin pep517 build-wheel -i /usr/bin/python3.12 --compatibility > off` > error: failed to select a version for the requirement `pyo3 = "^0.20.2"` > candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.22.2 > location searched: directory source `/usr/share/cargo/registry` (which is > replacing registry `crates-io`) > required by package `rpds-py v0.12.0 (/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>)` > perhaps a crate was updated and forgotten to be re-vendored? > As a reminder, you're using offline mode (--offline) which can sometimes > cause surprising resolution failures, if this error is too confusing you may > wish to retry without the offline flag. > 💥 maturin failed > Caused by: Cargo metadata failed. Does your crate compile with `cargo > build`? > Caused by: `cargo metadata` exited with an error: > Error: command ['maturin', 'pep517', 'build-wheel', '-i', > '/usr/bin/python3.12', '--compatibility', 'off'] returned non-zero exit > status 1 > > ERROR Backend subprocess exited when trying to invoke build_wheel > E: pybuild pybuild:389: build: plugin pyproject failed with: exit code=1: > python3.12 -m build --skip-dependency-check --no-isolation --wheel --outdir > /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.12_rpds-py > dh_auto_build: error: pybuild --build -i python{version} -p 3.12 returned > exit code 13 > make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary] Error 25 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/08/09/rpds-py_0.12.0-3_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240809;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240809&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: rpds-py Source-Version: 0.20.1-1 Done: Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rpds-py, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1078...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> (supplier of updated rpds-py package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 16:32:12 +0000 Source: rpds-py Architecture: source Version: 0.20.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Python Team <team+pyt...@tracker.debian.org> Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> Closes: 1078392 Changes: rpds-py (0.20.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. * Add debian/watch. * New upstream release: - Build with pyo3 0.22 (closes: #1078392). * Enable autopkgtest-pkg-pybuild. Checksums-Sha1: aa2ea654aff12217ed7dbd320f6b434c9e76a76a 2283 rpds-py_0.20.1-1.dsc 168f32f6bd4ccd15ee19a0abb934b81daf046f7d 25931 rpds-py_0.20.1.orig.tar.gz 44975ac06fb23cd195b8fbd9b56fbd1c34fc670d 2532 rpds-py_0.20.1-1.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 7afdb8ba508ef7f95a07c8501f21ee3b83114e3bf938d00ae5ba104eab276b66 2283 rpds-py_0.20.1-1.dsc e1791c4aabd117653530dccd24108fa03cc6baf21f58b950d0a73c3b3b29a350 25931 rpds-py_0.20.1.orig.tar.gz 20be9fc6b1688813d772ea9b5d1a6cc301ff08af1e55c988fc9fe83704307548 2532 rpds-py_0.20.1-1.debian.tar.xz Files: 911ba51d3c3268c41b89a6e7a9ceb6b4 2283 python optional rpds-py_0.20.1-1.dsc 2203e8b3993620b7fc1313702258f74b 25931 python optional rpds-py_0.20.1.orig.tar.gz b5273bc1288720a251a08213a36c49f1 2532 python optional rpds-py_0.20.1-1.debian.tar.xz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEErApP8SYRtvzPAcEROTWH2X2GUAsFAmcnpfIACgkQOTWH2X2G UAu6Vg/+IEiJtEmXXr7LU3UgGs1acEjo4gMdxHpEkpGXU6L70jYqiwt4G4UcC9hL wT2G8wj8xcsACsCWtb16KRAMKBYGobH8+v+U9rclRLkEFXkoN71Th1TReTN2tui+ MJY4HdDgmJnz7M9yvjWYR/egQWrbqRBRwNFaNV2wzu0k9TYaCmfBbpuTk3Gq/OP1 k/b+2VcMroe7lgZBj2cUYjkP6mfllsx75E10STtSWPetax2UQZBsKD63EGSQBZse MYiAdJMo7VBJdFYQdL73hrzkyylr9bnQr0BO0w2j1naI9/i4RKFMSuyczonqljTn xwAtBCHGbJn+aTHGnfgjbCTEZe6yN5Ka5Eh7gse4O6j+HIKRPc3oaNW12A6wmYmL LBOPwLdxfLOJYP88WDeFEdax1vW5thnymtHJyHa9OMWnAfvr21D+f4LwgYxkBMm+ 2EqS3YxnXSAxMzMuRIzMg4QheU7u8yBpDZkteb0V1hkDm1Ogbncp9H3/eNBrUSiT i1mpQIMwL3EGQOHPRGzqwQhvLhP9UZEquS+drrfj8kPmknmzTnJtcM09tGEtmQEW k85oEuuwOTQRVh2xkC/ejzwNQpKhwyII/ejBrTYUMU+yBLfOB9VGbvPHbyEu/mHH KFUEei/8jG/bAo6ofzNTLyvP7j4AlG6+V4BNOj6HnHY3YBLdOk4= =5z0L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpHJ2y0mlQb7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
