On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 09:20:13PM -0500, Steven Robbins wrote: > Certainly it would be nice to have C++ code build clean with every variation > of compiler switches. But does that rise to the level of a *release > critical* > bug? Is there a rule - written or unwritten - that leads one to that > conclusion?
The initial bug report was about ms-gsl autopkgtests failing, so it was filed as RC. When reassigning I kept the severity because I assumed that the code in gtest is incorrect from the point of view of the recent clang. I know nothing about clang, ms-gsl or gtest so it's possible that this is not an RC bug in anything listed, I just care about a revdep of ms-gsl and in the worst case I'll NMU ms-gsl to disable autopkgtests until it's maintained again. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
