Hello, Helmut Grohne, le ven. 20 sept. 2024 08:01:35 +0200, a ecrit: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Mon 19 Sep 2016 01:29:17 +0300, wrote: > > > Until that is implemented, the partition-table support in > > > libstore could be disabled altogether, because GNU Mach currently > > > provides a named device for each partition. > > > > But the installer does not use it, for flexibility. > > > > But storeio can be used as an intermediate between the two. > > > > But what is actually linked against libparted is libstoreio, which is > > shared between storeio and ext2fs. So we'd need two different > > libstoreio, one with parted support, the other without. > > Given that about eight years have passed, would either of you be kind > enough to check whether there still is a license incompatibility?
It is still there, yes. > If not, it feels unlikely that this will resolve itself soon. It's a matter of somebody taking up the task. That could happen within like a week if somebody works on it. > Would it make sense to move hurd into the contrib section as a means > of acknowledging the license problem? That would make things very complex for us, bringing way more work to make that working than just working on the actual issue. > Do you see another way of making forward progress here? Getting somebody to pick up the task. Samuel
