On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:09:31PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 12:17:53 -0500 Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> > wrote: > > I've recently adopted pypdf and pypdf2 into the Debian Python Team in > > response to an RFA for both packages. As these are somewhat security > > sensitive packages (among my first acts after adopting the packages was to > > upload proposed updates for both to address minor security issues in > > Bookworm > > in the next point release - same bug in both), I do not think we should > > release pypdf2 in Trixie and have filed an RC bug to that effect. > > > > If you want this package to be in Trixie, you will need to use pypdf > > instead > > of pypdf2. > > Now that pypdf2 is removed from Trixie, updating to serious.
I had a brief look at this and noticed that this package was previously ported to pypdf, but that the port was reverted in https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/packages/odoo/-/commit/d68da30bd5746f41e33c19ba5c2b8bc0f100e4d6. CCing Sébastien - was there a problem with the port? (Maybe https://bugs.debian.org/1032300? But that was closed six months before the commit above ...) Thanks, -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
