Your message dated Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:34:01 +0000
with message-id <e1shqgd-006n92...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1078391: fixed in checkpolicy 3.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078391,
regarding checkpolicy: FTBFS: checkpolicy.c:316:67: error: ‘cond_expr_t’ {aka
‘const struct cond_expr’} has no member named ‘bool’; did you mean ‘boolean’?
to be marked as done.This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1078391: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078391 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: checkpolicy Version: 3.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240809 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration > -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong > -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection > -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -Wextra -o checkmodule.o -c > checkmodule.c > checkpolicy.c: In function ‘display_expr’: > checkpolicy.c:316:67: error: ‘cond_expr_t’ {aka ‘const struct cond_expr’} has > no member named ‘bool’; did you mean ‘boolean’? > 316 | > policydbp->p_bool_val_to_name[cur->bool - 1]); > | ^~~~ > | > boolean > checkpolicy.c: In function ‘check_level’: > checkpolicy.c:373:46: error: ‘level_datum_t’ {aka ‘struct level_datum’} has > no member named ‘defined’; did you mean ‘notdefined’? > 373 | if (!levdatum->isalias && !levdatum->defined) { > | ^~~~~~~ > | notdefined > policy_define.c: In function ‘clone_level’: > policy_define.c:1009:27: error: ‘level_datum_t’ {aka ‘struct level_datum’} > has no member named ‘defined’; did you mean ‘notdefined’? > 1009 | levdatum->defined = 1; > | ^~~~~~~ > | notdefined > policy_define.c: In function ‘define_level’: > policy_define.c:1060:19: error: ‘level_datum_t’ {aka ‘struct level_datum’} > has no member named ‘defined’; did you mean ‘notdefined’? > 1060 | levdatum->defined = 1; > | ^~~~~~~ > | notdefined > make[1]: *** [Makefile:39: checkpolicy.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/08/09/checkpolicy_3.5-1_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240809;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240809&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: checkpolicy Source-Version: 3.7-1 Done: Russell Coker <russ...@coker.com.au> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of checkpolicy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1078...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Russell Coker <russ...@coker.com.au> (supplier of updated checkpolicy package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 19:10:10 +1000 Source: checkpolicy Architecture: source Version: 3.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian SELinux maintainers <selinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Russell Coker <russ...@coker.com.au> Closes: 1078391 Changes: checkpolicy (3.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release closes: #1078391 * Add extra upstream signing key for Petr Lautrbach Checksums-Sha1: 8c51c34904c8de859d96cd6ec7c590effb29cdc3 2263 checkpolicy_3.7-1.dsc 79a501ef7241cc64606f60b9949b4fc12d506965 74992 checkpolicy_3.7.orig.tar.gz 9e9ce308a3e661bd9b64d6d53324f3b311aab7c2 833 checkpolicy_3.7.orig.tar.gz.asc efa9d9357ce816c4cabccf1ee0da6f36264d1707 25624 checkpolicy_3.7-1.debian.tar.xz f7fa5793394e90effb75ea1264570e49446fd83d 6595 checkpolicy_3.7-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 38466bdad4efa2e2f2d231d6e53fa2294736a065f1a5234cf190ea39377afd91 2263 checkpolicy_3.7-1.dsc fd3e1925477d49946d1116938661af44c1f86f0d681466fd9f02eaa06002a07f 74992 checkpolicy_3.7.orig.tar.gz acbfd8400cf122977208f96f3d61dfed815caddc88ccfdde99c31ac22f4c3278 833 checkpolicy_3.7.orig.tar.gz.asc 5ab9c688ecf4aa7495451ffd30a1b34c11114f7c34ca84271787c136771dcbf4 25624 checkpolicy_3.7-1.debian.tar.xz 357f2f3727b7a5e6e8847c08f42ea245d5e6374cc9dd64a612fff9daf2a9720e 6595 checkpolicy_3.7-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: 5a36f0de24ff9c3858c62db289088a6a 2263 utils optional checkpolicy_3.7-1.dsc eb6a6fb57ed31ca664837dabe59396b3 74992 utils optional checkpolicy_3.7.orig.tar.gz 0605eaf1b8a751382cb58133be7e7552 833 utils optional checkpolicy_3.7.orig.tar.gz.asc 824a5c85a540490b65917e95ccc78c88 25624 utils optional checkpolicy_3.7-1.debian.tar.xz ba9d3d885137de874da7e90d6475027e 6595 utils optional checkpolicy_3.7-1_amd64.buildinfo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEn31hncwG9XwCqmbH0UHNMPxLj3kFAmbIVLQACgkQ0UHNMPxL j3lcQQ//R8EMZ9LT4QCw1PP/qSf0BnMV792x9AFTa0RzeboN3a6JLxF1JY9EWS2X SJb9gGw58qG28HZF9I6UzHVl3S9RqOUiDf8NZ3qk9oZ0cMZODHEE1qaNCUb4BS2t /20LSy0hfPRnJoJhnI6jL0QROpBH6saF0WoiUvAqyx6QXpnstyWbkSoh6wq8AlJE YW0koRnKKG3Z6TOQVErgjaQxzy0a8rxbzO9FRtBKCm9dTSmMI6WTHO3qSNgUSAD6 hoIiEkbR6kM1Fe0KZRKMK3Fn0STEtBeTVTUUUk1J3yqEUXYfVxwPyMYAZQUvNkr2 Jyedm8Cgpfv3yTNelaSdwE2STa8fMjCiy0qqOaYEU1JlBhQ1DHIVmixilJ4pIYns D4M0F08XC6TrIKt3MstefrCPxhxtYW2qfD+bHCz/9e3uC+KmbzYPsgPrzZhUM0xJ UCxRB0cuDRuiztXgePo81g3rc9AwhPn1lZkLMaIwI9Ttf9wakfF1PaqeONz3B9eE A/g+qe9DkHUlFcdvFas5rVY6Rb8kUCpLHDxt2we5McPunn73j3ffglLELikCtXK0 YmD6kMRGZRF/aBOxcfP9AB6LX17Ew997Ntcuqki4ZebwJOTSZUQaF+Gbei4IVQwz VtmKAqj4p1nEM4FR1eFlR0/jklCrFdHryQP18FF7Ul6laVeuEoY= =awUL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgpEYFFT1vx93.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
