Hi,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 10:23:43PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
Hi,

On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 10:21 PM Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:

Hi Aron,

On 14-07-2024 07:37, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 28-06-2024 5:44 a.m., Aron Xu wrote:
>> Would like to know if such steps would help resolve the issue better:
>>   - revert to a previous version which does not have API/ABI breakage
>>   - apply/port security patches on a best effort basis
>>   - help upstream to check and fix API/ABI changes
>
> I think all three would help, where the first one is the quickest one to
> get things moving again. Given the severity of the security issue
> mentioned in the changelog I think you could even consider ignoring item
> number two for now, but maybe you mean going forward.
>
>> Or do you have any recommendations?
>
> There is the option to do a Debian specific SONAME bump, but if the
> break was not intended and might get reverted that's probably a bad
> idea. And if the changes are here to stay, upstream should bump SONAME
> themselves.

While the upstream bug about the soname breakage seems to have halted,
can we please get some resolution in Debian please? The fact that
libxml2 can't migrate as-is is hurting more and more (particularly the
creation of a useful testing for riscv64).

If upstream is really reluctant to bump SONAME when they should, maybe
you should prepare for a maintenance scheme to do that in Debian when
needed. Ideally the scheme should be designed such that when upstream
bumps SONAME, you can follow them again.


Thanks for pinging again!

I was busy with $dayjob during the last week, will come up with a
solution this week and possibly talk to you on IRC/email about my
plan.

If there is a lot of more extra work here, I am happy to take on some
work if I can help.

Thanks,

BR,
Bo


Regards,
Aron


--
Regards,
--
  Bo YU

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to