Your message dated Thu, 1 Aug 2024 19:29:36 +0300
with message-id <zqu38mghq32op...@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#1076828: src:pslist: unsatisfied build dependency in
testing: feature-check
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076828,
regarding src:pslist: unsatisfied build dependency in testing: feature-check
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1076828: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pslist
Version: 1.4.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
removed from testing, but unfortunately there are multiple scenarios
where that can happen nevertheless. To uphold our social contract,
Debian requires that packages can be rebuild from source in the suite
we are shipping them, so currently this is a serious issue with your
package in testing.
Can you please investigate the situation and figure out how to resolve
it? Regularly, if the build dependency is available in unstable,
helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
in some other way.
Paul
Note: this bug report was sent after some quick manual checks using a
template. Please reach out to me if you believe I made a mistake in my
process.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_testing_main/latest/amd64.html
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 09:20:01PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: pslist
> Version: 1.4.0-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid trixie
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: edos-uninstallable
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
> build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
> removed from testing, but unfortunately there are multiple scenarios
> where that can happen nevertheless. To uphold our social contract,
> Debian requires that packages can be rebuild from source in the suite
> we are shipping them, so currently this is a serious issue with your
> package in testing.
>
> Can you please investigate the situation and figure out how to resolve
> it? Regularly, if the build dependency is available in unstable,
> helping the maintainer of your Build-Depends to enable migration to
> testing is a great way to solve the issue. If your build dependency is
> gone from unstable and testing, you'll have to fix the build process
> in some other way.
Right, there was a problem with the way a new version of feature-check
parsed some of its command-line options that were actually used by some
Debian packages' test suites. It is fixed now, and the new version of
feature-check migrated to testing earlier today.
Thanks for filing this bug, and for all your work on Debian!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org pe...@morpheusly.com
PGP key: https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
