Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382618: fixed in slat 2.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: slat
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of slat_2.0-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060812-0518
> ******************************************************************************
...
>       then mv -f ".deps/scanner.Tpo" ".deps/scanner.Po"; else rm -f 
> ".deps/scanner.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> if cc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"slat\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"slat\" 
> -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"2.0\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"slat\ 2.0\" 
> -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"slat\" -DVERSION=\"2.0\" 
> -DYYTEXT_POINTER=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 
> -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 
> -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
> -DHAVE_SEPOL_POLICYDB_H=1 -DHAVE_POLICYDB_READ=1  -I. -I.    -I../../include 
> -O2 -g -MT slat.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/slat.Tpo" -c -o slat.o slat.c; \
>       then mv -f ".deps/slat.Tpo" ".deps/slat.Po"; else rm -f 
> ".deps/slat.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> slat.c: In function 'security_contexts':
> slat.c:226: warning: passing argument 1 of 'role_set' from incompatible 
> pointer type
> slat.c:241: warning: passing argument 1 of 'type_set' from incompatible 
> pointer type
> slat.c: In function 'perm_flow_fun':
> slat.c:327: error: 'perm_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c: In function 'flow_in_class':
> slat.c:373: error: 'common_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c: In function 'constrain':
> slat.c:573: error: 'class_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c: In function 'gencommap':
> slat.c:716: error: 'common_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c: In function 'genclsmap':
> slat.c:734: error: 'class_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c:739: error: 'common_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c: In function 'initcom':
> slat.c:834: error: 'common_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c: In function 'action':
> slat.c:904: error: 'common_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c:918: error: 'class_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c:923: error: 'common_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> slat.c:925: error: 'common_datum_t' has no member named 'value'
> make[4]: *** [slat.o] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/slat-2.0/src/slat'
> make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/slat-2.0/src/slat'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/slat-2.0/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/slat-2.0'
> make: *** [build/slat] Error 2
> ******************************************************************************
> Build finished at 20060812-0519
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: slat
Source-Version: 2.0-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

slat_2.0-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/slat/slat_2.0-3.diff.gz
slat_2.0-3.dsc
  to pool/main/s/slat/slat_2.0-3.dsc
slat_2.0-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/slat/slat_2.0-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated slat package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:32:30 -0500
Source: slat
Binary: slat
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 slat       - Tools for information flow analysis of SELinux policies
Closes: 382618
Changes: 
 slat (2.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bug fix: "slat: FTBFS: error: 'perm_datum_t' has no member named
     'value'", thanks to Julien Danjou. This bug is obviously due to a
     change in <sepol/policydb.h>, the addition of an "s" member, which has
     the "value" member inside.  Thanks to Margarita Manterola for
     providing a patch.                                  (Closes: #382618).
   * Updated the build dependencies to match the fix above.
   * Updated standards version while at it.
Files: 
 4dca7b8144fda9690956d373fedb1084 570 admin optional slat_2.0-3.dsc
 ff26c1ae22c4b7dd3e5ca4d3c5c2b135 29561 admin optional slat_2.0-3.diff.gz
 496daed76b043482615307648b3399c6 163110 admin optional slat_2.0-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE6J4CIbrau78kQkwRAnj6AKDw0zoVQODi/DFPW+IXzA4wLiFuHQCdGwoa
PxFVX2x+CWiimnnG9llUW70=
=S8Bg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to