Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:07:49 +0000
with message-id <e1rlt37-00awmc...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1065815: fixed in racket 8.12+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065815,
regarding racket-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: racket-common (<< 8.12)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1065815: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: racket-doc
Version: 8.12+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts fileconflict

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
This error may also be triggered by having a predecessor package from
'sid' installed while installing the package from 'experimental'.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../racket-doc_8.12+dfsg1-1_all.deb ...
  Unpacking racket-doc (8.12+dfsg1-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/racket-doc_8.12+dfsg1-1_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/racket/release/Draw_and_GUI_5_1.txt.gz', 
which is also in package racket-common 8.10+dfsg1-2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/racket-doc_8.12+dfsg1-1_all.deb

The conflictig files are:

usr/share/doc/racket/release/Draw_and_GUI_5_1.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_10.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_11.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_2.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_3.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_4.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_5.txt
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_6.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_7.txt
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_8.txt
usr/share/doc/racket/release/HISTORY_9.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/MrEd_100.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/MrEd_100_Framework.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/MzScheme_200.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/MzScheme_300.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/MzScheme_4.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/racket/release/Racket_5.txt
usr/share/doc/racket/release/blueboxes.rktd
usr/share/doc/racket/release/index.html
usr/share/doc/racket/release/out0.sxref
usr/share/doc/racket/release/out1.sxref
usr/share/doc/racket/release/stamp.sxref


cheers,

Andreas

Attachment: racket-common=8.10+dfsg1-2_racket-doc=8.12+dfsg1-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: racket
Source-Version: 8.12+dfsg1-5
Done: David Bremner <brem...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
racket, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1065...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Bremner <brem...@debian.org> (supplier of updated racket package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 11:51:37 -0300
Source: racket
Architecture: source
Version: 8.12+dfsg1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: David Bremner <brem...@debian.org>
Changed-By: David Bremner <brem...@debian.org>
Closes: 1065815
Changes:
 racket (8.12+dfsg1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Upload to unstable
 .
 racket (8.12+dfsg1-4) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Cherry pick 40a530935c and 5a6921d from upstream in an attempt to resolve
     big-endian build problems.
   * Switch mips64el to BC backend, as PB backend seems buggy
     (https://github.com/racket/racket/issues/4952)
 .
 racket (8.12+dfsg1-3) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Move release notes back to racket-common (Closes: #1065815).
   * Cherry-pick 9d988ca1 from upstream to support PB mode on s390x
   * Enable PB mode on s390x
 .
 racket (8.12+dfsg1-2) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Enable portable bytecode (PB) backend to fix some builds (notably ppc64el,
     mips64el) where CS backend is not supported.
   * Use BC backend on s390x, as PB currently does not work there
     (https://github.com/racket/racket/issues/4951)
 .
 racket (8.12+dfsg1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Restart packaging with dh sequencer.
Checksums-Sha1:
 43170831e5fa600316d4c9323699097161c90316 2341 racket_8.12+dfsg1-5.dsc
 226a8e747a78153157d853ca8d53fec1412b1493 27252 
racket_8.12+dfsg1-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 794ee0bc50d85d3bf4b11ba78094a783b36aa5223a98664777592031c01285b5 2341 
racket_8.12+dfsg1-5.dsc
 98885e1e5db3bfd57a50466caa0431f9b069bf7dc2e90a5910f46032ecaf21dd 27252 
racket_8.12+dfsg1-5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 5ec2681ab5b708e2b93b7687322524fc 2341 lisp optional racket_8.12+dfsg1-5.dsc
 b7961f206f4fe431b2c79b284d3d8d0d 27252 lisp optional 
racket_8.12+dfsg1-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ugG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpYFSoLpdaCW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to