Your message dated Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:35:01 +0000
with message-id <e1rkqqz-00dncy...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066520: fixed in ftools-fv 5.5.2+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066520,
regarding ftools-fv: FTBFS: Visu_tkImgPict.c:1762:9: error: implicit 
declaration of function ‘_XInitImageFuncPtrs’ 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1066520: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066520
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ftools-fv
Version: 5.5.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

This is most likely caused by a change in dpkg 1.22.6, that enabled
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. For more information, see
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2024-03-13_-Werror.3Dimplicit-function-declaration

Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -c -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -fPIC -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" 
> -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" 
> -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DHAVE_CONNECT=1 -DHAVE_ACCEPT=1 
> -DHAVE_LIBDL=1 -DHAVE_STDIO_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 
> -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 
> -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 
> -DHAVE_DIRENT_H=1 -DHAVE_FCNTL_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_MALLOC_H=1 
> -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
> -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=1 -DHAVE_ALLOCA=1 -DRETSIGTYPE=void 
> -DHAVE_STRFTIME=1 -DHAVE_GETCWD=1 -DHAVE_SOCKET=1 -DHAVE_STRCSPN=1 
> -DHAVE_STRSPN=1 -DHAVE_STRSTR=1 -DHAVE_STRTOD=1 -DHAVE_STRTOL=1 
> -DVISU_LIBRARY=\"/usr/lib/pow\"  -I/usr/include/tcl 
> -I/usr/include/tcl/tk-private/generic/ 
> -I/usr/include/tcl/tk-private/generic//../unix  Visu_tkImgPict.c
> Visu_tkImgPict.c:57:5: warning: initialization of ‘int (*)(Tcl_Interp *, 
> const char *, int,  Tcl_Obj * const*, const Tk_ImageType *, struct 
> Tk_ImageMaster_ *, void **)’ from incompatible pointer type ‘int 
> (*)(Tcl_Interp *, char *, int,  Tcl_Obj * const*, Tk_ImageType *, struct 
> Tk_ImageMaster_ *, void **)’ [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
>    57 |     ImgPictCreate,              /* createProc */
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Visu_tkImgPict.c:57:5: note: (near initialization for 
> ‘tkPictImageType.createProc’)
> Visu_tkImgPict.c: In function ‘ImgPictCmd’:
> Visu_tkImgPict.c:985:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string 
> [-Wformat-zero-length]
>   985 |         sprintf(string,"");
>       |                        ^~
> Visu_tkImgPict.c:1034:24: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string 
> [-Wformat-zero-length]
>  1034 |         sprintf(string,"");
>       |                        ^~
> Visu_tkImgPict.c: In function ‘ParseSubcommandOptions’:
> Visu_tkImgPict.c:1341:16: warning: assignment discards ‘const’ qualifier from 
> pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
>  1341 |         option = argv[index];
>       |                ^
> Visu_tkImgPict.c:1501:32: warning: assignment discards ‘const’ qualifier from 
> pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
>  1501 |                 optPtr->format = argv[index];
>       |                                ^
> Visu_tkImgPict.c: In function ‘ImgPictConfigureInstance’:
> Visu_tkImgPict.c:1762:9: error: implicit declaration of function 
> ‘_XInitImageFuncPtrs’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  1762 |         _XInitImageFuncPtrs(imagePtr);
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Visu_tkImgPict.c: In function ‘ImgPictSnap2Pict’:
> Visu_tkImgPict.c:2607:37: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘Tk_FindPict’ 
> discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
>  2607 |   if ((destHandle = Tk_FindPict(argv[2])) == NULL) {
>       |                                 ~~~~^~~
> In file included from Visu_tkImgPict.c:26:
> tkpict.h:345:40: note: expected ‘char *’ but argument is of type ‘const char 
> *’
>   345 | extern Tk_PictHandle Tk_FindPict(char *imageName);
>       |                                  ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:138: Visu_tkImgPict.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/ftools-fv_5.5.2+dfsg-2_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ftools-fv
Source-Version: 5.5.2+dfsg-3
Done: Ole Streicher <oleb...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ftools-fv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1066...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ole Streicher <oleb...@debian.org> (supplier of updated ftools-fv package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:46:53 +0100
Source: ftools-fv
Architecture: source
Version: 5.5.2+dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Astro Team <debian-astro-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ole Streicher <oleb...@debian.org>
Closes: 1066520
Changes:
 ftools-fv (5.5.2+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add includes for missing function declarations. (Closes: #1066520)
Checksums-Sha1:
 13bfcff20286c0f3ff5420ecb02ddc1adc7c18df 2111 ftools-fv_5.5.2+dfsg-3.dsc
 6ad25eef52fc7a8e76362886f6c0501d58dca039 14232 
ftools-fv_5.5.2+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 7ba2534537bb421bafa862a5aa5debdf70323bdaf685f2c7d6f314a48a607dd0 2111 
ftools-fv_5.5.2+dfsg-3.dsc
 8486b7b8d7e3e06d8002f46fa01d1d3bcdcf3d4578aeb8bfba1e6c9fb3e4fe90 14232 
ftools-fv_5.5.2+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 8c08c92f18d225653b420506a5fdbc96 2111 science optional 
ftools-fv_5.5.2+dfsg-3.dsc
 9463213648ab9a9411611b77e8729ef6 14232 science optional 
ftools-fv_5.5.2+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5UOO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgp9b8e7y_wSU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to