Your message dated Fri, 08 Mar 2024 18:21:20 +0100
with message-id <87bk7o63k2....@daath.cgg.com>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] Bug#1065477: owncloud-client:
Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in unstable.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065477,
regarding owncloud-client: Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than
present in unstable.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1065477: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: owncloud-client
Version: 4.2.0.11670+dfsg-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
Version check failed:
Your upload included the binary package dolphin-owncloud, version
4.2.0.11670+dfsg-1.1, for amd64,
however unstable already has version 5.0.0-1+b1.
Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in unstable.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote on 05/03/2024 at 21:52:44+0100:
> On 2024-03-05 16:01:10 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 2024-03-05 15:42:49 +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote on 05/03/2024 at
>> > 09:38:13+0100:
>> >
>> > > Source: owncloud-client
>> > > Version: 4.2.0.11670+dfsg-1.1
>> > > Severity: serious
>> > > Tags: ftbfs
>> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
>> > >
>> > > Version check failed:
>> > > Your upload included the binary package dolphin-owncloud, version
>> > > 4.2.0.11670+dfsg-1.1, for amd64,
>> > > however unstable already has version 5.0.0-1+b1.
>> > > Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in unstable.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers
>> >
>> > owncloud-client has been uploaded far before in the past, and was
>> > shipping dolphin-owncloud, nautilus-owncloud, et al.
>> >
>> > In client v5, upstream removed these packages from the owncloud-client
>> > source, and therefore they're now packaged through dedicated source
>> > packages.
>> >
>> > These ones are the latest uploads.
>> >
>> > I'll upload the v5 version of owncloud-client source package which won't
>> > ship dolphin-owncloud et al anymore.
>> >
>> > It's what's been suggested to me, and therefore I can't see a bug here.
>> >
>> > Could you give me a bit more intel aobut why this would be a serious
>> > bug?
>>
>> The uploads by the buidds fail to be included in the archive since the
>> constraints are not satisfied. You can check the reject files for the
>> changes files from owncloud-client on coccia.d.o.
>>
>> You can also see on
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=owncloud-client&suite=sid
>> that the package is stuck in Uploaded state due to this issue.
>
> FWIW, the dolphin-owncloud binary package is provided with a higher
> version number by owncloud-client-desktop-shell-integration-dolphin. I
> suppose the dolphin-owncloud package can just be dropped from
> owncloud-client.
>
> Cheers
Yes, actually the root cause is the upload of T64 libs due to the t64
transition.
So a reupload of owncloud-client has been made inappropriately,
conflicting with my changes in experimental.
I've made my experimental-to-unstable upload for owncloud-client.
I'll see whether I can redo an upload for t64 variants.
Thanks,
--
PEB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
