Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2024 02:55:09 +0000
with message-id <e1rgc0l-00737l...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1063254: fixed in lua-luv 1.48.0-2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063254,
regarding lua-luv: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1063254: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063254
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lua-luv
Version: 1.44.2-0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t

Dear maintainers,

Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies
lua-luv as an affected package, on the basis that it depends on some library
whose ABI is sensitive to time_t, which requires reverse-dependencies to be
built with LFS support enabled, and lua-luv's own ABI is sensitive to LFS
support.

However, lua-luv's shlibs file declares a dependency on a library package
name that contains no ABI information:

$ cat DEBIAN/shlibs
liblua5.1-luv 0 lua-luv (>= 1.44.2-0)
liblua5.2-luv 0 lua-luv (>= 1.44.2-0)
liblua5.3-luv 0 lua-luv (>= 1.44.2-0)
liblua5.4-luv 0 lua-luv (>= 1.44.2-0)
$

It is therefore not obvious that we should rename the package to
'lua-luvt64' as part of this transition.

Looking at the archive, there are packages built from the separate lua-nvim
and neovim source packages that depend on this library.

Since there is no self-evident thing to do with the library package name
here, we will not be handling this package as part of the mass NMUs.
Instead I am filing a serious bug because partial upgrades from bookworm to
trixie on 32-bit architectures will result in ABI skew and may result in
broken behavior.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/01/msg00041.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lua-luv
Source-Version: 1.48.0-2-1
Done: James McCoy <james...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lua-luv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1063...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James McCoy <james...@debian.org> (supplier of updated lua-luv package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 20:24:41 -0500
Source: lua-luv
Architecture: source
Version: 1.48.0-2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lua Team <pkg-lua-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: James McCoy <james...@debian.org>
Closes: 1063254
Changes:
 lua-luv (1.48.0-2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Build-Depend against dpkg-dev >= 1.22.5 for the t64 transition
     (Closes: #1063254)
   * Disable loop tests since they fail with dh-lua's app-dynamic test cycle.
Checksums-Sha1:
 5deebc23ee20f62092cae09c0388014957405f95 2383 lua-luv_1.48.0-2-1.dsc
 d745cfa85e0894f07fe6c624d92bb7c0338c3acb 134821 lua-luv_1.48.0-2.orig.tar.gz
 40b1bea69955f445410745ff8f189cab20e0e691 5232 lua-luv_1.48.0-2-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 1e6e2947f1bf9757b5c9e89d6fcfa2c476ddddb8d664c41e6d31ac32a594d1ae 2383 
lua-luv_1.48.0-2-1.dsc
 e64cd8a0197449288b37df6ca058120e8d2308fc305f543162b5bf3e92273a05 134821 
lua-luv_1.48.0-2.orig.tar.gz
 8c403ca286db2771563b6c3520eacf888f3279bbc81a257f10b21df9c9d42863 5232 
lua-luv_1.48.0-2-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 b6be9750f58836c563ee55970c860e91 2383 interpreters optional 
lua-luv_1.48.0-2-1.dsc
 8efb4574249415a888a4197468529a9b 134821 interpreters optional 
lua-luv_1.48.0-2.orig.tar.gz
 c503c424e442c1814bdfd04ea72f4767 5232 interpreters optional 
lua-luv_1.48.0-2-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=J/gA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpZfNrGxFRzH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to