Your message dated Sat, 2 Mar 2024 14:46:18 +0000
with message-id <zem7uo_1mukhc...@tautology.pseudorandom.co.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1065280: glib2.0: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build 
dependency for time_t transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065280,
regarding glib2.0: missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) build dependency for time_t 
transition
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1065280: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065280
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: glib2.0
Version: 2.78.4-2.1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

Thank you for uploading the changes required for the time_t transition.
Unfortunately, the upload was missing dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) in
Build-Depends. This leads to two potential issues:

* The package is built with the wrong ABI.
* The package migrates to testing before the change is enabled in
  testing and builds there would be produced against the wrong ABI.

Please add dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5) to Build-Depends and upload the new
version ASAP.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.79.3-1

On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 at 11:23:35 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> This is already fixed in git, but we were told not to upload that version
> yet, to avoid interfering with the migration of the NMU currently
> in unstable (which, at the time, was believed to be sufficient and
> desirable). It is also already fixed in experimental (2.79.3-1).

Closing as fixed in experimental. For avoidance of doubt, I am aware
that this leaves the version in unstable with unfixed RC bugs, which I
will resolve as soon as I can, assuming a better developer does not get
there first.

    smcv

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to