Source: lua-cqueues Version: 3.1.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainers, Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies lua-cqueues as an affected package, on the basis that the headers could not be compiled and analyzed out of the box using abi-compliance-checker[2], so we have to assume it's affected. However, lua-cqueue's shlibs file declares a dependency on a library package name that contains no ABI information: $ cat DEBIAN/shlibs liblua5.1-cqueues 0 lua-cqueues (>= 20200726) liblua5.2-cqueues 0 lua-cqueues (>= 20200726) liblua5.3-cqueues 0 lua-cqueues (>= 20200726) liblua5.4-cqueues 0 lua-cqueues (>= 20200726) $ It is therefore not obvious that we should rename the package to 'lua-cqueuest64' as part of this transition. Looking at the archive, there is a package built from the separate lua-http source package that depends on this library. Since there is no self-evident thing to do with the library package name here, we will not be handling this package as part of the mass NMUs. Instead I am filing a serious bug because partial upgrades from bookworm to trixie on 32-bit architectures will result in ABI skew and may result in broken behavior. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/01/msg00041.html [2] https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-16T21%3A19%3A00/logs/lua-cqueues-dev/base/log.txt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
