Hi, On 14-02-2024 14:27, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
At the same time, https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mediawiki2latex says that the package could be installed,
I understand the confusing but the word "installed" on buildd.d.o means something else than that you can install the binaries. It means that the packages were incorporated (installed) into the archive.
so its runtime dependencies are correct, on architectures: amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x, alpha, hurd-i386, ia64, ppc64, sparc64.
Maybe you can try to install the binaries in a clean environment (I've done so, pasted below).
Paulroot@autopkgtest-lxc-vtalsf:/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.c47fu43n/downtmp/build.Nel/src# apt install mediawiki2latex
Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mediawiki2latex : Depends: chromium but it is not installable Depends: chromium-sandbox but it is not installable Recommends: calibre but it is not going to be installedRecommends: latex2rtf but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature