Your message dated Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:15:12 -0800
with message-id <zcbu4a7m69wun...@homer.dodds.net>
and subject line Re: alsa-oss: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063105,
regarding alsa-oss: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1063105: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063105
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: alsa-oss
Version: 1.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
architectures in 2038 and beyond
(https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
alsa-oss as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI
either is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be
analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe
side we assume is affected).
To ensure that inconsistent combinations of libraries with their
reverse-dependencies are never installed together, it is necessary to
have a library transition, which is most easily done by renaming the
runtime library package.
Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is
important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close
together in time. Therefore I have prepared a 0-day NMU for alsa-oss
which will initially be uploaded to experimental if possible, then to
unstable after packages have cleared binary NEW.
Please find the patch for this NMU attached.
If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although
this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a
period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information
becomes available that your package should not be included in the transition,
there is time for us to amend the planned uploads.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/alsa-oss.lintian-overrides
alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/alsa-oss.lintian-overrides
--- alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/alsa-oss.lintian-overrides 1970-01-01
00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/alsa-oss.lintian-overrides 2024-02-05
05:05:01.000000000 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+alsa-oss: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames alsa-oss
diff -Nru alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/changelog alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/changelog
--- alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/changelog 2022-11-30 18:36:20.000000000 +0000
+++ alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/changelog 2024-02-05 05:05:01.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+alsa-oss (1.1.8-2.1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> Mon, 05 Feb 2024 05:05:01 +0000
+
alsa-oss (1.1.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Import upstream signing key and configure watch file to check for
diff -Nru alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/control alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/control
--- alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/control 2022-11-30 18:17:41.000000000 +0000
+++ alsa-oss-1.1.8/debian/control 2024-02-05 05:05:01.000000000 +0000
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
Rules-Requires-Root: no
Package: alsa-oss
+Provides: ${t64:Provides}
+Replaces: alsa-oss
+Breaks: alsa-oss (<< ${source:Version})
Architecture: linux-any
Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry, this patch is useless and the scripts failed to pick it up.
I think alsa-oss doesn't need a transition for 64-bit time_t. It has no
reverse-dependencies in the archive, and we don't really want to have to
rename it to 'alsa-osst64'.
Closing this bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
