Your message dated Fri, 19 Jan 2024 17:40:12 +0000 with message-id <e1rqsqi-009dtd...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#1061049: fixed in suitesparse 1:7.5.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061049, regarding persalys: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:94: test] Error 8 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1061049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061049 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: persalys Version: 15.0+ds-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/builddir' > Running tests... > /usr/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process -j8 -R pyinstallcheck > Test project /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/builddir > Start 23: pyinstallcheck_SymbolicPhysicalModel_std > Start 24: pyinstallcheck_PythonPhysicalModel_std > Start 25: pyinstallcheck_PythonPhysicalModel_mp > Start 26: pyinstallcheck_DesignOfExperiment_mp > Start 27: pyinstallcheck_CouplingPhysicalModel_std > Start 28: pyinstallcheck_AnsysParser_std > Start 29: pyinstallcheck_CouplingPhysicalModel_logistic > Start 30: pyinstallcheck_features > 1/47 Test #30: pyinstallcheck_features ................................. > Passed 0.60 sec > Start 31: pyinstallcheck_Cogeneration_std > 2/47 Test #23: pyinstallcheck_SymbolicPhysicalModel_std ................ > Passed 0.64 sec > Start 32: pyinstallcheck_Crue_std > 3/47 Test #28: pyinstallcheck_AnsysParser_std .......................... > Passed 0.72 sec > Start 33: pyinstallcheck_DesignOfExperiment_std > 4/47 Test #29: pyinstallcheck_CouplingPhysicalModel_logistic ........... > Passed 0.78 sec > Start 34: pyinstallcheck_AxialStressedBeam_std > 5/47 Test #26: pyinstallcheck_DesignOfExperiment_mp .................... > Passed 0.79 sec > Start 35: pyinstallcheck_CantileverBeam_std > 6/47 Test #24: pyinstallcheck_PythonPhysicalModel_std .................. > Passed 1.16 sec > Start 36: pyinstallcheck_DataModel_std > 7/47 Test #25: pyinstallcheck_PythonPhysicalModel_mp ................... > Passed 1.22 sec > Start 37: pyinstallcheck_FunctionalChaosAnalysis_std > 8/47 Test #32: pyinstallcheck_Crue_std ................................. > Passed 0.82 sec > Start 38: pyinstallcheck_KrigingAnalysis_std > 9/47 Test #33: pyinstallcheck_DesignOfExperiment_std ................... > Passed 0.81 sec > Start 39: pyinstallcheck_MetaModelAnalysis_std > 10/47 Test #34: pyinstallcheck_AxialStressedBeam_std .................... > Passed 0.82 sec > Start 40: pyinstallcheck_PolynomialRegressionAnalysis_std > 11/47 Test #39: pyinstallcheck_MetaModelAnalysis_std > ....................***Failed 0.53 sec > *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated > Aborted > > Start 41: pyinstallcheck_MonteCarloAnalysis_std > 12/47 Test #37: pyinstallcheck_FunctionalChaosAnalysis_std .............. > Passed 0.86 sec > Start 42: pyinstallcheck_MonteCarloReliabilityAnalysis_std > 13/47 Test #36: pyinstallcheck_DataModel_std ............................ > Passed 0.94 sec > Start 43: pyinstallcheck_ImportanceSamplingAnalysis_std > 14/47 Test #35: pyinstallcheck_CantileverBeam_std ....................... > Passed 1.47 sec > Start 44: pyinstallcheck_FORMAnalysis_std > 15/47 Test #38: pyinstallcheck_KrigingAnalysis_std ...................... > Passed 0.83 sec > Start 45: pyinstallcheck_SORMAnalysis_std > 16/47 Test #31: pyinstallcheck_Cogeneration_std ......................... > Passed 1.92 sec > Start 46: pyinstallcheck_FORMImportanceSamplingAnalysis_std > 17/47 Test #42: pyinstallcheck_MonteCarloReliabilityAnalysis_std ........ > Passed 0.60 sec > Start 47: pyinstallcheck_TaylorExpansionMomentsAnalysis_std > 18/47 Test #27: pyinstallcheck_CouplingPhysicalModel_std ................ > Passed 2.82 sec > Start 48: pyinstallcheck_SobolAnalysis_std > 19/47 Test #44: pyinstallcheck_FORMAnalysis_std ......................... > Passed 0.58 sec > Start 49: pyinstallcheck_SRCAnalysis_std > 20/47 Test #43: pyinstallcheck_ImportanceSamplingAnalysis_std ........... > Passed 0.80 sec > Start 50: pyinstallcheck_LimitState_std > 21/47 Test #45: pyinstallcheck_SORMAnalysis_std ......................... > Passed 0.65 sec > Start 51: pyinstallcheck_InferenceAnalysis_std > 22/47 Test #40: pyinstallcheck_PolynomialRegressionAnalysis_std ......... > Passed 1.42 sec > Start 52: pyinstallcheck_CopulaInferenceAnalysis_std > 23/47 Test #46: pyinstallcheck_FORMImportanceSamplingAnalysis_std ....... > Passed 0.71 sec > Start 53: pyinstallcheck_OptimizationAnalysis_std > 24/47 Test #47: pyinstallcheck_TaylorExpansionMomentsAnalysis_std ....... > Passed 0.56 sec > Start 54: pyinstallcheck_MultiObjectiveOptimizationAnalysis_std > 25/47 Test #48: pyinstallcheck_SobolAnalysis_std ........................ > Passed 0.62 sec > Start 55: pyinstallcheck_MeshModel_std > 26/47 Test #49: pyinstallcheck_SRCAnalysis_std .......................... > Passed 0.61 sec > Start 56: pyinstallcheck_PythonFieldModel_std > 27/47 Test #50: pyinstallcheck_LimitState_std ........................... > Passed 0.73 sec > Start 57: pyinstallcheck_SymbolicFieldModel_std > 28/47 Test #52: pyinstallcheck_CopulaInferenceAnalysis_std .............. > Passed 0.72 sec > Start 58: pyinstallcheck_FieldModelEvaluation_std > 29/47 Test #41: pyinstallcheck_MonteCarloAnalysis_std ................... > Passed 1.77 sec > Start 59: pyinstallcheck_FieldMonteCarloAnalysis_std > 30/47 Test #54: pyinstallcheck_MultiObjectiveOptimizationAnalysis_std ... > Passed 0.71 sec > Start 60: pyinstallcheck_Observations_std > 31/47 Test #53: pyinstallcheck_OptimizationAnalysis_std ................. > Passed 0.75 sec > Start 61: pyinstallcheck_CalibrationAnalysis_std > 32/47 Test #55: pyinstallcheck_MeshModel_std ............................ > Passed 0.64 sec > Start 62: pyinstallcheck_Study_refCount > 33/47 Test #57: pyinstallcheck_SymbolicFieldModel_std ................... > Passed 0.59 sec > Start 63: pyinstallcheck_Encoding_std > 34/47 Test #56: pyinstallcheck_PythonFieldModel_std ..................... > Passed 0.84 sec > Start 64: pyinstallcheck_docstring > 35/47 Test #58: pyinstallcheck_FieldModelEvaluation_std ................. > Passed 0.60 sec > Start 65: pyinstallcheck_FileMemoizeFunction_std > 36/47 Test #51: pyinstallcheck_InferenceAnalysis_std .................... > Passed 1.59 sec > Start 66: pyinstallcheck_DataCleaning_std > 37/47 Test #60: pyinstallcheck_Observations_std ......................... > Passed 0.67 sec > Start 67: pyinstallcheck_probabilistic_analyses > 38/47 Test #61: pyinstallcheck_CalibrationAnalysis_std > ..................***Failed 0.65 sec > [34m[1mWRN - Warning, in Normal::computeProbability(), the dimension is > very high. We will use a Monte Carlo method for the computation with a > relative precision of 0.1% at 99% confidence level and a maximum of 100000000 > realizations. Expect a long running time and a poor accuracy for low values > of the CDF...[0m > *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated > Aborted > > Start 68: pyinstallcheck_field_analyses > 39/47 Test #59: pyinstallcheck_FieldMonteCarloAnalysis_std .............. > Passed 0.83 sec > Start 69: pyinstallcheck_deterministic_analyses > 40/47 Test #62: pyinstallcheck_Study_refCount ........................... > Passed 0.63 sec > 41/47 Test #63: pyinstallcheck_Encoding_std ............................. > Passed 0.63 sec > 42/47 Test #65: pyinstallcheck_FileMemoizeFunction_std .................. > Passed 0.54 sec > 43/47 Test #66: pyinstallcheck_DataCleaning_std ......................... > Passed 0.54 sec > 44/47 Test #68: pyinstallcheck_field_analyses ........................... > Passed 0.49 sec > 45/47 Test #67: pyinstallcheck_probabilistic_analyses ................... > Passed 0.54 sec > 46/47 Test #69: pyinstallcheck_deterministic_analyses ................... > Passed 0.54 sec > 47/47 Test #64: pyinstallcheck_docstring ................................ > Passed 1.43 sec > > 96% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 47 > > Total Test time (real) = 5.74 sec > > The following tests FAILED: > 39 - pyinstallcheck_MetaModelAnalysis_std (Failed) > 61 - pyinstallcheck_CalibrationAnalysis_std (Failed) > Errors while running CTest > make[2]: *** [Makefile:94: test] Error 8 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/01/15/persalys_15.0+ds-3_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240115;users=lu...@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240115&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: suitesparse Source-Version: 1:7.5.1+dfsg-2 Done: Sébastien Villemot <sebast...@debian.org> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of suitesparse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1061...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sébastien Villemot <sebast...@debian.org> (supplier of updated suitesparse package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 17:54:36 +0100 Source: suitesparse Architecture: source Version: 1:7.5.1+dfsg-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot <sebast...@debian.org> Closes: 1061049 Changes: suitesparse (1:7.5.1+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * cholmod-abi-fix.patch: new patch taken from upstream. Reverts ABI break introduced in suitesparse 1:7.4.0+dfsg-1. (Closes: #1061049) Checksums-Sha1: 985e0cc69527c78fafea67567ab5503b73b76853 3302 suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2.dsc 7d3a476c7abc447f4c64f3d0b67fb1f48c2ab07c 26708 suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz 17d52de377e5efa979274f4df22f8b11c79cd1f9 21173 suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 8b55f7ca28d7940534fa5f93a6669ed8aa404ef974c398b0c056db1bf7f20b2c 3302 suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2.dsc 45ac2b9a116c506525094c409046ac6282a4c8196cc326bb2cfcded4e635f71e 26708 suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz d83c393ca9f588d8a2a525304c136c06c2f4feb75e451be81c880a1aaaeefc30 21173 suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2_amd64.buildinfo Files: d138915da05ca469fe4ebf0d90049945 3302 math optional suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2.dsc ac23141f6d6dc7a8b6eac7bf551189d1 26708 math optional suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz 4b49409070a0b94a3fb4d5a65a033c71 21173 math optional suitesparse_7.5.1+dfsg-2_amd64.buildinfo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEU5UdlScuDFuCvoxKLOzpNQ7OvkoFAmWqrtwACgkQLOzpNQ7O vkrJoA/9EktFUTLJ68wO2lkBh8QqrgxxygEiofYaUDWQUhNTx3FjhM3JduWWkt0m bwJRq6q+rhI000iw942mE/XcazyXDUYWnvA722OuLNBhkudgSG9t+S3+0AvoX8tW IGrA3LUm+txpb1U85AXtsg9XhS5Ds+SmEd5pebhVGHUDTGRJUNp25TvdheNxlwqu HpNFcIS6Y9GbrXXrtfY7eHu1fobNbAbLFRuFO3uZoJahZYNFl0cGw0HORHrvPvRg yD2oUjZYvNpX9EA0CM/5/YXe0ZssobGe6l4N4k3wiPqOEF+45/k4mtYHyrHfnu1U YDds7uFho0tGgylN2NLl0JnzkT5tdnGO+VcxY+qdjzEmXgtEsCMgkCAGdG7vCtQD 6iPK6q6HvJtU62Vl4cv0soUjElycC+F5++BdbmTM1/BlmNxJ5k70pxWALVFgnmQx 5VcZETVYA/F6Xgs/2SC0mtYenPVZ5mJiAIEBVInN85d3aZcqmDWbD1BpjFy1ealU dTkIdX2qYoy5phBFF448XmwTnUPKiAbEB1Ol03BkqA7FDD6/1HceFsHGkYW2MvY9 DHvYYWa5AnvoJ0q8QoCGUel/QvlmYu/NSnQ3isIu2o3CXPLdKjp7bqkTIY3N2VTo 9E4/2nX/aTj3JBLrav8pAFCVnuFohc66KHthZrSX1rG6SGkAsAo= =74FC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
