Your message dated Mon, 1 Jan 2024 17:11:57 +0100
with message-id <f46719cb-c259-4737-9bcf-3054fbd27...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: mat2: test failure
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056594,
regarding mat2: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1056594: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056594
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mat2
Version: 0.13.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Currently mat2's test suite fails, maybe due to newer libimage-exiftool-perl
releases. This can be seen on ci.debian.net, but the same failures
occur during the build tests, so the package FTBFS.
I've locally added upstream commit
https://0xacab.org/jvoisin/mat2/-/commit/bbd5b2817c9d64013e2f5ed670aca8d4738bb484
as a quilt patch, and the tests pass both during build and
autopkgtest.
Cheers,
gregor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=mYNd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.13.4-2.1
On 01-01-2024 10:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have uploaded the attached changes.
But I forgot to add the right "Closes:" stanza.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
