Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 09:31, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> I confirm this might be a fast solution. However, this would mean to
> restrict the functionality of the package for architectures where the
> package is used just to work around a compilation error where the
> package is not used in practice. I do not think this is the best
> solution for our users.
Fair enough.
I think the vbz compression is not actually enabled by upstream for
all architectures (amd64 and arm64 only?).
So restricting the architectures of the build-dependency on
libvbz-hdf-plugin-dev might be sufficient.
At least, the patch below was enough to get r-bioc-rhdf5filters
building on s390x for me, and it does not seem to be affected by the
pandoc/haskell-pandoc issue.
Regards
Graham
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
libhdf5-dev,
libzstd-dev,
libsnappy-dev,
- libvbz-hdf-plugin-dev
+ libvbz-hdf-plugin-dev [!s390x !hppa !m68k !powerpc
!ppc64 !sparc64]
Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-r
