Your message dated Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:22:59 +0100
with message-id <b5e1e742-6623-491d-b4a5-f24981dde...@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1056183: texlive-luatex: lualatex exits immediately
due to new zlib
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056183,
regarding texlive-latex-base: lualatex - zlib library version does not match
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1056183: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056183
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2023.20231007-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When trying to compile a Latex file with lualatex, lualatex fails immediately
with the following messages:
"""
> lualatex toto.tex
PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (zlib library version does not
match - header: 1.2.13, library: 1.3)
zsh: IOT instruction (core dumped) lualatex toto.tex
"""
zlib1g is indeed at the version 1.3 in sid.
(zlib1g is at 1.2.13 in testing/stable)
-- Package-specific info:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning
the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have problems with
combination of packages in a LaTeX document, please consult your
local TeX User Group, the comp.text.tex user group, the author of
the original .sty file, or any other help resource.
In particular, bugs that are related to up-upstream, i.e., neither
Debian nor TeX Live (upstream), but the original package authors,
will be closed immediately.
*** The Debian TeX Team is *not* a LaTeX Help Desk ***
If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries
(latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong
output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the
error in your report.
Please run your example with
(pdf)latex -recorder ...
(or any other program that supports -recorder) and send us the generated
file with the extension .fls, it lists all the files loaded during
the run and can easily explain problems induced by outdated files in
your home directory.
Don't forget to also include minimal examples of other files that are
needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps
to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures!
If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of
output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem),
you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that
can be found at
http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini-en.html (english)
or
http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini.html (german)
##################################
minimal input file
##################################
other files
######################################
List of ls-R files
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 80 Apr 8 2020 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3471 Nov 20 10:35 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Oct 12 2022 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Oct 8 22:00 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Oct 8 22:00 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
######################################
Config files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Oct 13 2022 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Oct 8 22:00 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ->
/var/lib/texmf/fmtutil.cnf-DEBIAN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 8 22:00 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ->
/var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3430 Nov 10 10:00
/var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat
######################################
Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Sep 4 2021 mktex.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Oct 13 2022 texmf.cnf
######################################
md5sums of texmf.d
ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=fr:en_US
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages texlive-latex-base depends on:
ii fonts-lmodern 2.005-1
ii tex-common 6.18
ii texlive-base 2023.20231007-1
ii texlive-binaries 2023.20230311.66589-7
texlive-latex-base recommends no packages.
Versions of packages texlive-latex-base suggests:
ii texlive-latex-base-doc 2023.20231007-1
ii wp2latex 4.3+ds-2
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii ucf 3.0043+nmu1
Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii debhelper 13.11.8
Versions of packages texlive-latex-base is related to:
ii tex-common 6.18
ii texlive-binaries 2023.20230311.66589-7
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 18.11.2023 11:48, Nick Black (Public gmail account) wrote:
Package: texlive-luatex
Version: 2023.20231007-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: dankamong...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Forcemerge did not work as expected. Instead of closing one bug, 5 were
re-opened. Re-close.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
