Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:13:52 +0200
with message-id <20230925091352.eoodwtx2qh44l...@bobek.cz>
and subject line Re: Bug#1052518: RM: gtkguitune -- RoQA; dead upstream;
depends on gtk2; alternative exists
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052518,
regarding RM: gtkguitune -- RoQA; dead upstream; depends on gtk2; alternative
exists
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1052518: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052518
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gtkguitune
Severity: serious
I intend to file a RM bug for gtkguitune. It is dead upstream and the last
Debian upload was over a decade ago.
With lingot, there is a better alternative available in Debian. Also, this
would help getting rid of gtkmm-2.4.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Bastian,
thank you for you bug report. I've recently requested couple ROMs for
obsolete packages and was thinking about gtkguitune as well.
I've filled the ROM as
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052608
Thank you,
Antonin
* Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org> [2023-09-23 19:18] wrote:
> Source: gtkguitune
> Severity: serious
>
> I intend to file a RM bug for gtkguitune. It is dead upstream and the last
> Debian upload was over a decade ago.
> With lingot, there is a better alternative available in Debian. Also, this
> would help getting rid of gtkmm-2.4.
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
